Thesis in “a Rose for Emily”
Carolina J. Garcia GarciaFebruary 18th, 2011 Summary: “A Rose for Emily” thesis In “A Rose for Emily”, William Faulkner discusses that change ought to be acknowledged by everyone– the past ought to be left in the past– which is supported by Emily’s case, who wanted to change however was not supported by the town. Point 1 She wanted to transform her pre-Civil War self– which was a very traditional one; practiced slavery, lived in a stunning mansion, and took care of money; a similarity of her dad– to a post-Civil War Emily.
Textual Evidence Emily started a relationship with Homer Barron as stated by the town, “… we started to see him and Miss Emily on Sunday afternoons” (Faulkner 81). Contextual Evidence As stated by Du Fang in his article “Who Makes a Devil out of a Fair Lady?,” Emily is portrayed as a devil by the southern social system. Analysis of a Sign Homer Barron represents flexibility, progress, modernity, and modification. Point 2 The town did decline Emily and Homer’s relationship since she was viewed as a monument to them.
Textual Evidence “Miss Emily had actually been a tradition, a responsibility, and a care; a sort of hereditary obligation upon the town” (Faulkner 79). Textual Proof The town did not accept the interracial relationship in between them, as we see when “the women began to state that it was a disgrace to the town and a bad example to the youths” (Faulkner 83), so they called her cousins. Contextual Proof Du Fang suggests that Emily and Homer’s relationship might not be because “it breaks standard southern womanhood, since a pure, holy southern lady ought to not have any desire to peruse her happiness. Analysis of a Sign Emily was the sign that represented the old south. Point 3 While Emily accepted modifications in her customs and the town did not, she did decline modification in her structure and the town did. Textual Evidence Faulkner exhibits the adjustments to be made in the town which “had simply let the agreements for paving the walkways” (81) and those of “garages and cotton gins” which “had intruded and wiped out even the august names of the area […] only Miss Emily’s home was left” (79 ).
Textual Evidence Faulkner represents Emily’s dissent towards modifying her structure, in this case her house, when he narrates that the town got a complimentary postal delivery and “Miss Emily alone refused to let them attach the metal numbers above her door and attach a mail box to it” (83 ). Contextual Proof In concurrence with the Literary Cavalcade, Faulkner’s description of Emily’s home does evince that she has fallen from a state of wealth into among poverty.
Contextual Evidence Faulkner’s description of your house in human terms–“persistent and coquettish”– implies that Miss Emily herself embodied these qualities. Analysis of a Sign Emily’s structure, her home, represented her and the actual idea of the old south; they were the haunting past of the town. Functions Cited Anonymous. “Checking out In Between the Lines.” Literary Cavalcade. Research study Library,2004. 28-30. (scanned copy of the short article found utilizing ProQuest from the U.
P. R. M. ‘sdatabase) Fang, Du. “Who Makes a Devil out of a Fair Lady?.” Canadian Social Science. Canada: Canadian Academy of Asian & & Occidental Culture, 2007. 18-24. (scanned copy of the short article found utilizing Academic Browse Total fromthe U. P. R. M.’s database) Faulkner, William. “A Rose for Emily.” Literature: Reading, Fiction, Poetry, andDrama. Robert Diyanni, Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2009. 79-84.