Themes of the Count of Monte Cristo

Styles of the Count of Monte Cristo

The count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas is the novel composed a long period of time earlier, in 1844. The story happens in France and Italy, throughout the historic occasions of 1815– 1839. It begins prior to the Hundred Daysperiod, when Napoleon returned to power after his exile. The historic setting is a fundamental element of the book, an adventure story mainly worried about themes of hope, justice, vengeance, mercy, and forgiveness. It centers on a male who is wrongfully sent to prison, leaves from jail, gets a fortune, and sets about exacting vengeance on those accountable for his imprisonment. His strategies have ravaging effects for both the innocent and the guilty.
Styles of The Count of Monte Cristo are really hard. It is the game of balance in between vengeance and forgiveness, power and powerlessness. When primary hero was prisoned without being guilty, he comprehended that life is really unjust. He invested hours and days planning on what he will finish with individuals who did it to him. When he accidentally leaves from prison and appeared back to life of rich people. However having whatever once again he still continues considering vengeance. He strongly thinks that God offered him a chance to escape since he liked the concept of revenge. Instead of living innocent, carefree, life-loving boy of nineteen, Dantes is now a solidified, cynical, and mistrustful man in his mid-thirties. After the fourteen years in a cage he understands that he will never go there once again, and will fo whatever to escape and for justice.
Very first time after escape from the jail count wants to commit suicide, as he didn’t want to live. However a lady Haydee confesses her love for him, and the count thinks it is the indication that he is now forgiven, that now he can perform things he desired and prepared. Take note with desire words Monte Cristo concludes the book:
Count: “Tell the angel who will watch over your life to pray now and then for a guy who, like Satan, thought himself for an immediate to be equivalent to God, however who recognized in all humility that supreme power and knowledge are in the hands of God alone.”
Count: “Just a guy who has actually felt ultimate misery can feeling supreme happiness.”
These quotes underscore the styles of the entire novel:
1) God is constantly more powerful than guy.
2) Only God can punish and reward.
3) Only a male who understands deep unhappiness can experience true joy.

Free choice

The majority of the time individuals do not have free choice to select something. The exact same thing is here. Individuals were born just in wrong place and time having no power to contradict someone. In this book individuals don’t invest too much time considering free will. Do you know any characters of the book who are concerned on their fate? Do you know any who begin looking for it? Normally they stop and believe just after doing something. Only when they see that whatever goes against them they start grumbling believing that some unidentified forces are near them. Main hero thinks that he is charged by God, and he will be the one who will whatever clearly and appropriately.
Reminisce the minutes and make decisions on your own.
1. After Villefort is driven mad, Monte Cristo changes his strategy and decides to pardon Danglars. This causes a conundrum: If the Count is performing God’s will, as he declares, are we to believe that his change of mind was constantly a part of the plan? Or is it, on the contrary, proof of free choice?
2. Villefort acts as though his father’s stroke and subsequent paralysis were a disaster, and portrays apoplexy as the hand of Fate. How do the Villefort poisonings, which mimic the effects of apoplexy, change our perception of the condition, if at all? Simply put, does the book encourage us to see suffering as a concern of fate, or something brought on by complimentary acting people?

The Limits of Human Justice

Edmond Dantes takes justice into his own hands since he is puzzled by the constraints of society’s criminal justice system. That justice permitted individuals to put him into prison like a canine and to forget that they did something bad to a real human, to person with sensations, to someone who did nothing wrong and bad. He does not believe that system will punish that bad guys, additionally, even if his opponents’ criminal offenses were uncovered, Dantes does not believe that their punishment would hold true justice. He knows and remembers the number of years of suffer his enemies offered to him and he knows for sure that he will not do the same. He will not eliminate him in emotional method, he will do it physical one. His enemies will suffer for all things they did for him simply for a few seconds, and then, death.
Considering himself as an agent of Providence, Dantes aims to carry out magnificent justice where he feels human justice has actually failed. He thinks that the best method to punish someone is to start with individuals who that individual cares many of all. To do everything, they did to him; to make individuals feel his pain.Later, hero sees how he make suffer innocent people, andhow bad it feels after that. He felt guilty.
Last message of Duma in this epic book of criminal activity and punishment is that humans must simply resign themselves. Individuals need to permit God do things as they need to be done and stop thinking that they are smarter. Individuals can’t do all things on their own, God can’t inform the individual to eliminate or to make someone suffer. Satan can, God can’t.

Love vs Alienation

Issue of love is really important in this book. It appears like Dante carries out just his intricate plan of vengeance. It feels to readers that Dante is cut off everything typical– country, society, good relationships and typical human emotions and relationships. Main hero is totally unable to experience pleasure, or sorrow, love or any other pleasant emotion. However at the same time he is completely efficient in feeling cruel hatred and periodic gratitude. It is reasonable that his character is the result of other human beings’ actions, that only they are guilty in things that occurred to Dante. It is not difficult to imagine that a decade-long devotion to a task like Dantes’s might take a significant toll on one’s psychology.
This humanizing force ultimately returns when Dantes falls in love with Haydee. This relationship reconciles Dantes to his humanity and enables him to feel genuine feeling once again. In a victorious statement of feeling, he states to Haydée, that through her he again link himself with life, through her he shall suffer, through her rejoice. Dantes’s overcomes his alienation, both from society and from his own mankind, through his love of another human being.


Vengeance is all over in The Count of Monte Cristo. It doesn’t even matter who is speaking, what is the age of the person, who is he by gender and race. It seems like the unique desires us to see that a bad side of human is constantly opened. No matter what will take place there will be somebody who will do vengeance.
During the text count keeps speaking about revenge from the point of old school’s view. He repeated taking an eye for an eye, and firmly insists that the sins of daddies will be given to their boys– and beyond. Is among them right and the other incorrect? They can’t both be right, right?
At book’s end, we need to ask ourselves, as Edmond asks himself, if we’re pleased with the way things end up. Was the revenge rewarding? Was it actually justified? Was it all Edmond hoped it would be? Likewise, here’s a huge question: Is Edmond validated in seeking his revenge? And another: Is he really effective when he discovers it? Are his 10 years of planning well invested?


An excellent wisdom states that all great thins will come to the individual who can wait. At the end of the book we see that the main hero agrees with it. He even stated to Valentine and Maximilian: “Wait and hope … wait and hope”. He knows it for sure, he was waiting on 24 years figuring out what he wishes to do and what will he do. Determination is a great word to explain Monte Cristo’s life. His potential customers are so low, that just 100% pure, untainted perseverance will do. When it comes to The Count of Monte Cristo, though, perseverance isn’t practically the persistence of any single man, however the persistence of a suitable, of conviction, of justice.


In The Count of Monte Cristo, the changed ends up being the transformer. Edmond, irrevocably changed during his time in prison by forces beyond his control, discovers to transform the world around him. Whatever from his clothing to his character to his name is adjustable. A few of his changes are comic– witness his capability to shift from one “character” to another effortlessly– while others are lethal severe. Oftentimes all it takes is a superficial change, but when the situation calls for something more, the Count can increase to the event.


Adjustment is the important things that each person comprehends by him/herself. Obviously it is a bit filthy word as nobody wants to create an idea that throughout some time we were manipulated by somebody. Sure, control of Fate and God are not that much bad, as they constantly do everything that will make things better for us in the future. In the book we see this when Edmond understands that he was manipulated by so many people, when he understood why he remains in the jail. Also book shows silver linings of manipulation: when count comprehended how much imagination and cleverness requires each work to be done in the best way.
You do not concur? Then try to remember:
1. When the count wished to revenge he involves numerous individuals voluntarily and reluctantly. Can you see that the way he did it was a control? Do you understand that such sort of impact can’t be excellent?
2. Likewise, we are thrilled by many things that the Count is able to do. After realizing all this can we see that his actions were made meant great? Or he had just bad ideas in his mind?


Once a really smart guy stated, “Fear results in anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” Well, possibly it was not a male, it was Yoda from Star Wars however you understand the sense of these words. Dislike is an extremely effective thing which is really difficult to control. It might lead to very weird and awkward scenarios. It is a thing which awakes just the worst sides of human’s soul. When a bad things happens, all people, including count, wonder that this is simply a bad luck. They don’t see that their bad life is the result of their own hate.
To sum it all up, we can say that thinking about significant styles can be handy to the reader. We recommend you not to forget reading books really attentively, do not forget that very important information are hidden, and only curious reader can get crucial details and develop the text in other method than people do. Book is really strong with great deals of styles which are explained so masterfully by A.Dumas.

You Might Also Like