The Conflict Between The Individual and The Society in A Rose for Emily

The Dispute Between The Person and The Society in A Rose for Emily

One of Faulkner’s most well-known short story, A Rose for Emily is based on the style of the stark conflict in between the specific and the impersonal voice of the community. To emphasize this idea, the story is rendered through the cumulative point of view of the neighborhood that consists of Miss Emily.

Not unintentionally, the plot of the story is set in a village, where the relationship between the individual and the society is a really tight one. Additionally, the storyteller of the story finds himself or herself amongst individuals in the town and even speaks in the very first individual plural, maintaining for that reason a collective view of the events.

The heroine of the story appears for that reason even more particular and isolated, when regarded through the analytical lens of the neighborhood. The complex relationship between the individual, Emily Grierson, and the society, is stressed in a number of methods. This conflict develops because Emily, a noble woman of a high social standing, rejects all the social standards and conventions and enshrouds herself in her own fantasies and fixations instead of actively taking part in the social life.

The psychotic mind of the main character is therefore opposed to the gossiping neighborhood, which is limited to the function of a witness in this story. The reason for Emily’s power is precisely her insanity which also offers her an absolute and lawless flexibility of action.

What stands out is that Faulkner draws the picture of a disrupted and obsessive person, by setting it at a range from the reader’s instant understanding. If, in the majority of his novels, Faulkner utilizes numerous viewpoint and the technique of the streams of awareness to narrate the events, in A Rose for Emily the protagonist is examined from the perspective of an entire community.

The viewpoint that the townspeople deal on Emily’s story is, nevertheless, similarly unreliable. Miss Emily is explained from the viewpoint of the community as a really haughty person, respected by everybody on account of her nobility however mostly misunderstood. The gossiping, ghostly voice of the town is left outside the properties of your home where the woman isolates herself.

Her rejection to pay taxes in addition to all her other whims and peculiarities are accepted by everyone without argument, simply since she becomes part of the upper, aristocratic social class. When she passes away however, the very same community is stunned when they understand Miss Emily had actually amused a perverse fixation throughout her remote life, and had slept with the dead body of her previous fan, whom she had actually poisoned herself.

Thus, the battle between the lady’s desires and the opposing forces is now evident: she stubbornly holds on to the memory of her father and to the body of her dead enthusiast, unwilling to relinquish her sensations for them. Emily’s fascination initially with her daddy’s remains and with that of the enthusiast is at the core of a morbid marriage dream that is the concept of the story.

For that reason, Emily violates all the standard principles of her neighborhood, beginning with the laws of social interraction– she separates herself and rejects all human contact- and continuing with tax evasion and even with the concealment of the remains of her enthusiast, Homer Barron in her own room.

She is for that reason a murderer or in any case a compulsive or mad individual who however handles to avert social punishment. Through her, Faulkner draws a brilliant picture of madness and the method which a specific manages to literary live out the most psychotic fancies in the middle of a regular small-town community.

By meaning, madness is characterized as a major deviation from the accepted human behavior. Without being openly unreasonable or incontrollable, Emily Grierson has a certainly obsessive mind which leads her to respond against the laws of society. Her purposeful self-incarceration in her own home and her obvious withdrawal from the typical life of the neighborhood indicate the dispute between the individual and society.

Emily revolts against social standards and picks to live in her morbid dream instead. She gets ready for a ritualistic marriage that she feels she can not fulfill otherwise than through death. Her privacy from society is also considerable, as she withdraws in the security of her own dream and turns down the presumption of a pre-established social role.

The morbid gesture of violence that Emily carries out is a poignant rejection of social conventions associated with gender and marital relationship. However, her rejection of social existence does not point simply to the continuous tension between individuality and neighborhood: Faulkner represents here the gap between the individual consciousness and the collective voice.

Although the impersonal narrator would seem to prohibit mental questions in the story, the voice of the neighborhood itself develops psychological stress. In spite of her willful isolation, Emily’s madness can for that reason just be understood as a reaction to social constraint. The author highlights the obsessions that consume Emily as part of her response to public opinion. While the lady lives her obsession is silence and privacy, the society sees all her movements acutely and with undiminished interest.

The most curious phenomenon in the text is in fact her existence as a person amongst the other common people of the community, and the way in which she handles to evade the control of society over her own life. The neighborhood explained here by Faulkner has a gossipy and even haunting voice that hovers over the household where Emily lives in total isolation.

As the story is distinguished the viewpoint of this analytical and agitated neighborhood, the reader gets a peek of the method which Emily Grierson moves quietly on, from one generation to another, closely enjoyed by the members of her social environment. What is curious is that, with all its controling force, the community fails to manage Emily and her madness: “Hence she passed from generation to generation– dear, unavoidable, invulnerable, relaxing, and perverse” (Faulkner 1970, p. 179).

Faulkner highlights this truth by referring to Emily’s strangely strong and pervasive impact as a conquest of the social power. In this story, the specific appears to accomplishment over society and insanity accomplishments over norm. Remarkably, the murder of the fan is in itself an anti-social act as well as a token of Emily’s compulsive nature.

However, the fact that Emily handles to get away social control to a certain degree does not make her a free individual. Her marital relationship dream is the token that her habits is identified, a minimum of partially, by her reaction to social influence.

The real motives of the murder carried out by Emily stay unclear because of the gossipy narrative voice. It can be observed that Emily chose to perform her own mad marital relationship ritual by obtaining a bride-to-be’s gown and all the required devices and preparing herself for the wedding-murder ritualistic.

Thus, she evades social laws and designs her own marital relationship ritual, keeping her lover with her in spite of the social forces that are attempting to interfere. Especially, the women of the town even attempt to discourage her from pursuing her relationship with a male of a lower social standing. The society therefore works its usual strategies against the person, only here it is the community that is beat whenever.

Neither gossiping nor disturbance prosper. Thus, Emily’s exceptional strength helps her keep the guy she desires in spite of his own will which of the society itself. It is specifically her insanity that makes Emily extremely effective. She does not think in laws and therefore all social impositions fail.

Another instance of Emily’s obstinate rejection of social regulations is the late funeral service for her daddy, due to her rejection to bury him. When, after the murder of Homer, the town looks out by the nasty odor coming from Emily’s home, the town representatives are so shy that they sneak in the yard in the evening to resolve the smell, without having the guts to face the woman.

Emily’s main stand therefore appears to be rejection: she declines to comply with any of the frequently accepted social standards, and therefore takes complete belongings of her life and even of that of the male she likes. Faulkner therefore describes the dispute in between the non-conformist person and the social forces, indicating the specific as a victor.

Emily declares outright independence from social impositions and stands apart from the neighborhood, regardless of the truth that she is closely viewed by the eyes of the mass. Her power originates from her madness and her specific character, which handle to keep her aloof from the meddlesome society. Thus, in Faulkner’s story, the relationship in between the private and the community is modulated by the person’s capability to have typically inappropriate beliefs and even to act them out, through force and self-respect.

While Emily’s triumph over society seems total, it should be kept in mind that Faulkner lays a great focus here on psychology. The female’s fascinations with the two important males in her life, her daddy and her lover, indicate a fixation with the masculine forces. Emily is consumed with the 2 males and is intent on protecting their bodies after death to meet her fantasy.

It becomes obvious that, in Faulkner, the rejection to accept death is more than the result of the discomfort felt by Emily at her loss. She really eliminates the man she enjoys, and then holds on to his corpse- this can be translated as an attempt to dominate death. It is not simply the failure to accept that makes the lead character act in this method, however a desire for self-preservation against the chances of death.

What is likewise substantial is that Emily ends up being obsessed with maintaining the remains of the 2 men she loves, rather than only their memory. Her fixation needs to see the materialization of her fantasy. Instead of holding on to the memories she has of her fan, Emily holds on to the actual corpse that lasts longer than the enthusiasm itself: “The body had obviously when depend on the attitude of a welcome, today the long sleep that lasts longer than love, that dominates even the grimace of love, had actually cuckolded him” (Faulkner 1970, p. 182). In A Rose for Emily therefore, Faulkner paints the image of individual fixation in its direst kinds, emphasizing the inevitable conflict with society.

Although Emily neglects all the social policies and norms that are troubled her, she does not do this as a sign of simple disobedience. The protagonist is not interested just in asserting her self-reliance and uniqueness over the voice of society. Emily is the portrait of the specific mind which is haunted by its own satanic forces and which can not exist in the confines of the social milieu.

Her fascinations point to individual insanity as opposed to the sobering voice of the neighborhood. The point of view that Faulkner chooses for his story is really substantial in the story. Rather of providing the story from the within Emily’s compulsive mind, he chooses the voice of the neighborhood as the storyteller.

In this way, the “we” of the community is efficiently opposed to the “I” of the disturbed and lonesome character. It can be said that the story has naturalist overtones in addition to being a circumstances of psychological examination. Emily’s morbid dreams are a token of her fascination with the body and with the sensual world.

Therefore, Emily’s story is a mental query into the pathological obsession of an individual. Her withdrawal from society is a token of the individual’s inability to adapt to the social demands and requirements. While Emily’s case is an extreme one, Faulkner alludes to the preeminence of these impulses in most of the people.

He points to the mental complexity of the individual and to his actual needs, which will sometimes prevent him from working as a member of society. The real dispute is therefore between the self and the other. The story underlines the problem of adapting to a hostile social environment, which is moreover curious and gossiping.


Faulkner, William (1970 ). A Rose for Emily. Columbus. Merrill Publishing Business.

You Might Also Like