The Catcher in the Rye and The Outsider books hold importance to today’s society.
? Albert Camus’ The Complete Stranger and J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye are both amongst the most important novels of the twentieth century. The contemporary world’s basic moral change and the individual’s alienation from the society act as the primary, standard subject for both books which is still relevant to any twenty first century reader. Considering that many people find themselves in the same position of feeling like an outsider from society in their own worlds, I plan to outline how it still finds relevance today.
Both characters, Meursault and Holden Caulfield share the very same sense that they are alienated from the worlds in which they reside in which is essential to a twenty very first century reader as many individuals have issues absorbing themselves into society. Like Holden, teenagers today likewise resist complying with society’s norms as is likewise highlighted in The Complete stranger with the protagonist Meursault. Salinger picks to narrate his unique so that the novel that depicts his lead character, Holden’s, transition from teenage years to their adult years.
In contrast, Camus writes his book in order to record the occasions leading up to, and the last days in the past, the execution of his main character, Meursault. Through the employment of settings, characterisation and endings, both authors imply that society’s pressure on the specific to suit plays a major part in both of these climaxes, this has huge value to any twenty very first century reader as the subject is still challenged in today’s society. Both characters Meursault and Holden Caulfield suggest that society pressures individuals to fit in and conform to.
Holden is a teen struggling with the truth that everyone needs to grow up, which to him implies that you have to become “phony” or corrupt. Holden ranges himself from the adult world therefore to remain a child he gets himself expelled from schools. While on the other hand Meursault does things for no real reason. He is totally aloof, unattached and practically an unemotional individual. He does not believe much about events or their consequences, nor does he express much feeling in relationships or during psychological times.
Both of these characters express their detachment from society which matters for lots of people in the twenty very first century’s society as many individuals discover trouble discovering their location within civilization. Holden’s conversational tone and option of words shows his rebellion from adult society as a stereotypical teenager. His aggravation with grownups is characterized by his persistent usage of words like “goddamn,” “puked,” “hell,” “crap,” and “moron.” When Holden describes Jane’s stepfather, he discusses how he would “run around the goddamn house naked”.
He continues using this word when he tells the reader how Sally was speaking with a college good friend, “they continued their goddamn dull conversation”. This associates with a twenty very first century teenager in specific as they also have their own language to separate themselves from their moms and dads such as in the type as instant messaging where abbreviations litter their discussions. Holden also attempts frantically to have nearly a direct discussion with the reader, knowledgeable about his audience; he attempts to impress the audience by exaggeration or repetition through a narrative tone.
There is a sense that Holden wants the audience to like him as he uses the audience as a counsellor as outpours his concepts. This relates to numerous teenagers in the twenty first century as they try to find their place in civilization or a school society and may go to extreme lengths to find themselves and create a track record for people to bear in mind them by. In The Outsider, it is nearly the opposite with Meursault. Through brief scientific sentences and abrupt punctuation it highlights a separated character.
Rather he lists a rational idea procedure and lays out what he thinks, nearly unaware of a reader highlighted in the opening lines, “I’ll catch the two o’clock bus and get there in the afternoon. Then I can keep the vigil and I’ll come back tomorrow night. I asked my manager for 2 day of rests …” This almost list style of composing makes it possible for the reader from developing a connection or impression to the character as there doesn’t appear to be much depth to his emotions or opinions.
Meursault differs from Holden in the sense that he does not yearn for attention and want individuals to like him his actions throughout the book describe how he is a stranger to society as he can’t fathom why everyone around him is so interested in his being. The story analyzes the uncertainty of justice: the general public official assembling the information of the murder case tells him repentance and turning to Christianity will conserve him, but Meursault refuses to pretend he has actually discovered faith; emotional honesty overrides self-preservation, and he accepts the idea of punishment as a repercussion of his actions as part of the status quo.
The actual death of the Arab as a human being with a household is seems practically unimportant, as Camus informs us little bit more about the victim beyond the fact that he is dead. Undoubtedly, Meursault is never ever even asked to face, show or comment upon the victim as anything aside from as a repercussion of his actions and the cause of his current predicament. The humankind of the victim and inhumanity of killing another human being is relatively beside the point. The book holds huge significance to the twentieth century reader as an intriguing theme in The Complete stranger is that of seeing or observation.
Camus is writing a book about our unlimited look for significance: that we are all trying to find a purpose in our lives. The characters of The Complete stranger all view each other and the world around them. Meursault sees the world go by from his veranda. He later on passively enjoys his own trial; the world around him is a fascination to Meursault. He acutely observes the sun, the heat, the physical geography of his environments. The eyes of the jury and witnesses at his trial, finally the concept of the watching crowd, representing the eyes of society, as he is an outsider of the world he surrounds himself in.
To conclude, both The Complete stranger and The Catcher in the Rye are both relevant to various people within the twenty very first century society for several reasons, but both novels were written with the same subject of how one suits society. Due to both characters in the novels being from various age groups within society it permits them to become essential to people within those very same age today as lots of deal with the same problem of finding themselves an outsider within their society.