Of Mice and Guy Essay-a Contrast In Between Lennie and Sweet
The unique “Of Mice and Guy” is filled with characters that depict weakness. They are Steinbeck’s commentary on the general attitude towards the “weak”, and on the stereotype of “weak”, and possibly even on the belief of “survival of the fittest”-social darwinism. Candy’s canine and Lennie are two characters that do so possibly the most substantially, although in the case of Sweet’s canine it is somewhat less apparent as he’s not given much of a character. Upon digging deeper into these 2 characters, you will find that they share similarities in spite of one of them being human and the other a pet.
Both Lennie and Sweet’s pet dog are viewed as weak and ineffective. This is specifically real for Candy’s dog-nobody, not even Candy, can seem to find an usage for him. He is referred to as stinky, old, and practically lifeless. Candy does not concur nor disagree with this; however he defends his pet dog by saying “I been around him so much I never discover how he stinks.” and “he was the very best damn sheep dog I ever seen.” Both of these characters are kept around due to the fact that their companions enjoy them. For Candy’s pet dog, that is the only reason he lives for as long as he did. Till he lastly gave in, Sweet declined to let his pet dog pass away.
Lennie, on the other hand, is somewhat useful. He is strong and large, that makes him excellent at his job. However the disadvantage to Lennie is that he is mentally weak. Lots of characters in the book feel this way about Lennie. Like Slim, for example; “Possibly he ain’t brilliant, however I never seen such an employee.” Both of these characters are also a concern to their buddies. Although Sweet and George don’t like to admit it, Candy’s pet and Lennie are perhaps more problem than they’re worth. When further checking out the details of these two relationships, you’ll discover that Sweet’s dog and Lennie “belong” to their buddies.
It would be accurate to refer to Candy and George as their “owners”. Naturally, Candy’s dog being a family pet, it goes without stating that he is owned by Candy. But in Lennie’s case, the relationship is unhealthy-even abusive. Lots of aspects of George and Lennie’s relationship suggest that Lennie might too be a pet. This is revealed when, for example, Lennie enters a fight with Curley. He breaks off the fight just when he is ordered to do so by George, similarly to the way a master would provide commands to his dog. Neither Candy’s canine nor Lennie actually get the opportunity to believe for themselves.
Naturally, Candy’s pet dog can not speak as humans can, so Sweet must “be” his voice. Lennie, however, is perfectly capable of speaking for himself; but George is afraid that permitting Lennie to speak will trigger problem for them both. Like when George threatens Lennie in order to keep him peaceful so that they do not lose their job. Although Lennie and Sweet’s dog are thought about useless, their buddies depend on them as much as they do their companions. Candy is lonely and his pet dog keeps him business. He does not care that the canine is of no worth or use to him, he’s just delighted to have somebody who makes him pleased.
After Candy’s dog is killed, Candy is pushed further into solitude; he feels as though part of him passed away when his canine did. This is a contributing factor in Sweet’s interest to live with Lennie and George on their “dream farm”. Candy is sick of his life as a rancher, and now that his pet is gone he feels as though he can never ever more than happy once again. Continuing with this exhausted, colorless life will just advise him of his dog, and he wishes to rid his ideas of him. He wants to start a new life where he can find new sources of joy, now that his last staying one is dead.
This is similar to the dependency in George and Lennie’s relationship. George claims that he only keeps Lennie around because he is a good worker, but really there’s far more to it than that. Lennie makes George feel required. George sees Lennie as his responsibility; Lennie is childish and George requires to take care of him. Without Lennie, George would not understand what to do with himself. Lennie and George describe this when they state “But not us! An’ why? Since I got you to look after me, and you got me to care for you,” Despite the truth that Lennie is strong and capable of harming people, he choses not to do so.
On the other hand, Sweet’s pet is most likely incapable of doing harm to people. But the dog is seen as an object rather than a specific, so the way that he feels towards other characters is uncertain; for that reason it’s difficult to state what actions he would take against people if he were provided the chance to. It is said in the novel that Candy’s dog is strong, however he is too weak to use his strength. While Lennie could hurt anyone he wished to, however he selects not to. This is among the distinctions between Lennie and Sweet’s pet; Lennie is in control of his actions, Sweet’s canine is not.
Nevertheless, George tries to manage Lennie’s actions. While he believes this will assist Lennie, by doing this George is robbing Lennie of his voice. Contrastingly, Candy is doing the opposite for his dog. By speaking up for his pet dog, Candy is providing his pet a voice; his dog can not interact in the way human beings can. Another distinction in between Lennie and Sweet’s dog is their lifestyle. Much of the enjoyment and happiness that Sweet’s canine probably utilized to have in his life is now missing. He is only wanted by Candy-he’s considered useless to everybody else, and he has nothing to look forward to.
Sweet’s dog may have wanted to pass away. Lennie, nevertheless, had a life that was practically simply starting. He imagined owning a farm with George, and he actually had a chance to make this dream a reality. However Lennie’s dream passed away together with him. Another similarity between Sweet’s dog and Lennie is their deaths. Although Sweet’s dog is eliminated early on in the story and Lennie is eliminated at the end, they belong to one another. The death of Sweet’s dog foreshadows the death of Lennie. These two are, based upon society’s standards, weak, inferior animals.
In a world where just the strong endure, there’s no space for them, and so they need to be eliminated. This becomes apparent when Candy’s pet dog is eliminated, and it puts this idea in the reader’s-and the character’s-heads. This foreshadowing continues when Sweet tells George: “I should of shot that pet dog myself, George. I should not ought to of let no stranger shoot my canine.” Although George doesn’t appear to think much of this discussion at the time, it later enters into play after Lennie eliminates Curley’s wife. Sweet’s dog is old, blind, and a problem to his owner. Sweet enables Carlson to shoot the pet to put it out of its torment.
When George realizes that Lennie will be lynched by Curley’s guys or thrown into jail for eliminating Curley’s better half, he realizes that he needs to put his good friend out of his torment like Candy’s canine was. George takes it upon himself to kill Lennie out of empathy. He uses Carlsons gun-the one the pet dog was shot with-and shoots Lennie himself. George puts his pal out of his anguish as Sweet wished he had actually finished with his canine. Although it’s safe to state that Lennie and Candy’s pet were 2 of the “weakest” characters, they were also two of the greatest. They possesed something that the rest of the characters in this story did not.
They made the reader and the other characters think, however they might never figure Lennie and the dog out so they were brushed off and offered labels. They had various, new perspectives and ways of life that individuals at that time could decline. Lennie and Candy’s dog were mocked since others failed to understand why they were the way they were. The society in location in the setting of “Of Mice and Men” didn’t know what to do with individuals like Lennie and Candy’s canine; so they took the simple path and eliminated them rather than attempting to understand them.