Of Mice And Guy Relative Essay– Of Mice And Men/What’s Eating Gilbert Grape
Although the book Of Mice and Guy and the film “What’s Consuming Gilbert Grape” have two various plots, the styles are extremely comparable. The theme of both stories depicts the battle of a relationship between a caretaker and a handicapped person whom is getting the care.
In addition to the having a hard time relationship experienced by a caretaker and a handicapped person, the style of both stories expresses the battle of life in general. In both stories, the struggle of life can be translucented a number of elements. Both George and Gilbert experience negative psychosocial impacts due to the fact that of the handicapped individual they are caring for.
One of the major, and perhaps the most apparent, psychosocial impacts Gilbert and George experienced was a lack of social liberty. Caring for another human being is a full time job which leaves little time to “play”. Unlike Arnie, who is always trying to find something or someone to have fun with, Gilbert is tied down by the obligations that accompany taking care of his fatherless household.
Gilbert can not hang around with his good friends when he anticipated to play the role of the daddy along with Arnie’s full-time caretaker. With the jobs that accompany these functions, Gilbert is fortunate he gets adequate time to sleep. If Gilbert takes time out of his day to be social, such as speak to his brand-new acquaintance Becky, Arnie often enters into difficulty or puts himself in threat without even understanding it.
For example, Arnie’s lack of the ability to factor and resolve problems nearly kills him when Gilbert leaves him to take a bath on his own so he can go to Becky’s home. Although Arnie had taken a shower consistently every day of his life, he still stopped working to accomplish the simple job without the supervision and help of Gilbert.
This resulted in a frightening experience in which Arnie almost froze to death. Luckily, Gilbert discovered him still in the bath tub the next early morning. Although Arnie’s mistake might appear minute, he later gets himself sent to prison by climbing the water tower.
Like Arnie’s history of mistakes, Lennie’s mistakes also have a broad range of seriousness. His errors range from accidentally eliminating a mouse or pup, to being accused and prosecuted of rape, along with killing a lady. George takes part in the same functions as Gilbert and shares a relationship with Lennie that is similar to Gilbert and Arnie’s relationship.
Typically Lennie has to be accompanied by George in order to be employed, accepted, or make easy choices and judgments. The failure to judge his own strength just becomes hazardous when George is not around, which held true when Lennie killed his puppy. The idea of eliminating an animal when committing an innocent act such as cuddling it was unconceivable to George.
He believed the pup might baby-sit Lennie while he went to go play horseshoes with the other guys without Lennie entering any difficulty. George made the same presumption that Lennie might deal with an easy task alone simply as Gilbert assumed Arnie could. In the brief time George invests playing horseshoes, Lennie manages to eliminate the young puppy and Curley’s other half.
These actions later on cost Lennie his life, which goes to reveal that George literally might not spend an hour in the absence of Lennie. The lack of social flexibility the caretaker experiences in both stories is severe, along with unpreventable.
Along with being highly restricted socially, Gilbert and George’s socio-economical opportunities were almost non-existent. Because of George’s pledge to Lennie’s Auntie Clara, mentioning he would look after Lennie, he was obliged to find a job both himself and Lennie could finish.
Of Mice and Male occurs throughout the Great Anxiety when low-cost, difficult labor prevailed. George would not be able to support himself and Lennie with only one job, so finding a simple job for Lennie was also a commitment. The 3rd commitment George dealt with was accompanying Lennie on the task.
Due to Lennie’s extreme mental simplicity and attention requirement, George needed to find a mindless job such as bucking barely, to satisfy all of the above commitments. These elements make sure that the possibility of George having the ability to change social classes is virtually impossible, if not non-existent. Because of this, the quality of his life will probably never enhance.
Gilbert is also faced with the brutal reality of never ever being able to enhance his social status since he too, needs to bring Arnie with him to his location of employment. Due to the town’s little size and close-knit relationships, Gilbert’s manager enables him to bring Arnie to work. If Gilbert were to reside in a larger town where he had a more sophisticated job, he would be unable to give Arnie the attention he requires.
This implies Gilbert would have to pay an outdoors source to take care of Arnie, which in turn, would eliminate the money he is making. The possibility of Gilbert getting a more sophisticated job is fairly slim given that Gilbert does not have any of the spare time or cash needed to go to college, nor does he have the chance to explore his own interests or capabilities.
The absence of opportunity and the abundance of responsibilities Gilbert and George are stricken with would suffocate a typical individual. When one reaches the end of the book and discovers the death of Lennie, it might be thought that all of George’s worries are gone due to the fact that George is no longer limited by the commitment of caring for another person.
Nevertheless, one may not understand the mental impacts the caretaker experiences when the person they have actually taken care of throughout an extended period of time passes away. George was doing Lennie a favor when he eliminated him since Lennie ignored what was happening. If Curley had actually successfully taken revenge on Lennie for killing his other half, his penalty would have been considerably more traumatizing.
George wondered if Curley would take Lennie back to the camp to be tortured or if he would savagely murder him. Either way, George knew the only method Lennie could pass away a peaceful death was if he eliminated Lennie himself. Although Lennie did not know George will eliminate him, George was aware of what he needed to do.
The death of a disabled individual increases the opportunity of the caretaker experiencing complex sorrow and that possibility boosts even more when the caretaker is bound to take the life of the handicapped person themselves.
Gilbert is also at risk for experiencing complicated grief, but unlike previously, it is another disabled individual that puts him in this position. Gilbert looks after two disabled people, his mother who is morbidly obese and his mentally handicapped sibling, Arnie. This time Gilbert’s mom represents the handicapped individual rather Arnie.
Towards completion of What’s Consuming Gilbert Grape, the handicapped individual, Gilbert’s mother, also passes away. The chance Gilbert’s brother or sisters will experience complex sorrow is possible also due to the fact that Gilbert might have supported her financially, but they all had to assist care for her. The risk of experiencing complex sorrow would be even greater because the caretakers were directly associated to the handicapped person and their relationship with the person covered throughout their whole life time.
The method which Gilbert’s mother died is also traumatizing to the caretakers, as it was when George was forced to shoot Lennie. Gilbert’s mother collapsed on a bed to rest after climbing a flight of stairs. Throughout the time she was thought to be resting, her heart failed and she passed away. Her place was not ideal considering her weight, and the cops informed Gilbert that it would take a crane to get her out.
Gilbert raged since he did not desire his mom to be a joke to the town anymore and unconsciously they all did not wish to experience the embarrassment. As a last hope, they burnt down the house. To see their most valuable possession damaged in front of their eyes, along with the unusual death of their mom, it is difficult to deny they would not experience complicated sorrow.
Gilbert and George both experience a lack of socio-economic chance, a lack of social freedom, as well as negative psychological results because of the death of the disabled individual they are looking after. The resemblances between the impacts of these three aspects contribute to why George and Gilbert’s experience of negative psychosocial impacts are practically identical.
In conclusion, if the duties of caring for the handicapped person had been spread out uniformly amongst more people, George and Gilbert would not have actually been at such high risk of experiencing complicated sorrow, along with the negative socio-economic impacts and lack of social mobility that accompanied them even after death of the disabled person.