Oedipus vs. Hamlet: a Character Comparison
This paper is the outline variation. There are grammatical mistakes and other such errors in it. Oedipus vs. Hamlet: A Character Contrast After reading Sophocles’ Oedipus the King and Shakespeare’s Hamlet, it is quiet clear that Oedipus is by far the more admirable character of the 2. Aside from Oedipus’ history and life experience, his superior character characteristics are also displayed in the method he handles several incidents throughout the play. One of the primary factors Oedipus’ is more admirable than Hamlet is simply their history.
Oedipus is a king. He arrived by conserving the city of Thebes from a dreadful Sphinx by resolving a riddle. In this method, Oedipus made the trust of his people and earned the position of king. On the other hand, you have Hamlet who is the prince of Denmark. He didn’t make the position as Oedipus did. He was just born into it. In addition, he does not appear to have any life experiences. He is merely a trainee in college. Oedipus also has numerous exceptional character traits in which Hamlet does not have.
For example, Oedipus is a go getter. He doesn’t stand by and get info and just sit on it. In numerous events throughout the play he reacts quickly on info he has received. When Tiresias notifies him that it is he that is menstruation of the land, Oedipus reacts rapidly and highly. He instantly questions Tiresias’ motives and has him removed from his existences. In addition, he instantly faces Creon with his suspicions. “You- here? You have the gall to show your face before the palace gates?
You, plotting to kill me, kill the king- I see it all, the marauding burglar himself scheming to steal my crown and power! Tell me, in god’s name, what did you take me for, coward or fool, when you spun out your plot?” (594-601). Here, Oedipus suspects that Creon is attempting to eliminate him, and he right away faces him and challenges him. On the extreme opposite end of the spectrum, we have Hamlet. Ah, Hamlet. His dead daddy appears to him as a ghost and tells him that his uncle, Claudius killed him. The snake that did sting thy dad’s life now wears his crown.” (38-39) If Hamlet had half the courage of Oedipus he would have left from the meeting with his father’s ghost and put a sword through Claudius’ heart. Rather, nevertheless, he hatches this sophisticated and confusing plot, which involves acting mad, directing a play to “see” how Claudius reacts and turning his back on his love, Ophelia. When Claudius is praying in the church, later on in the play, Hamlet comes up with a factor not to revenge his daddy.
He reasons he can’t eliminate Claudius while he is hoping since it will just send him to paradise. This is an obvious reason not to act. Hamlet is incredibly inactive and passive. Another factor Oedipus’ is a more good character than Hamlet is because of the distinctions in the way they treat the women they enjoy. Oedipus is plainly in love with Jocasta, revealing it by treating her well and appreciating her opinion on things. Hamlet chooses to imitate somebody who is insane, and disrespects Ophelia even reaching to talk bad to her.
He even tells her he never ever enjoyed her. “I loved you not.” (116) In addition, the simple reality that Oedipus confides in Jocasta shows the love and trust they have in between each other. Oedipus suspects himself of killing the king, and he confides in Jocasta what he thinks he’s guilty of. This is a secret that could perhaps damage him, yet he informs his wife. Hamlet isn’t even guilty of murder. He merely believes his uncle killed his father. Instead of confiding in Ophelia he turns his back on her. Not exceptional at all. Oedipus is likewise smarter than Hamlet.
In the beginning of the play when Oedipus speaks with Tiresias he thinks that Tiresias and Creon have actually outlined to eliminate him and take the throne. Although he is incorrect in his presumption he is still open minded and defending against any possible betrayal. Nevertheless, Hamlet strolls blindly into his death by accepting a sword battle with an opponent whose dad he has eliminated and the promoter who has actually killed his own father. This is not smart behavior! Another location where their characteristics shine through is the method which they each decide to handle their particular crisis.
Oedipus chooses to blind himself by gouging his eyes out. “He dupes her brooches, the long gold pins holding her robes? and raising them high, looking straight up into the points, he digs them down the sockets of his eyes, weeping, “You, you’ll see say goodbye to the pain I suffered, all the discomfort I caused.” (1403-1407) this type of action is harsh and directed right at himself. He doesn’t fear what he is doing. Hamlet, being the passive coward he is considers suicide, however doesn’t carry it out for fear of what he will deal with in the afterlife. However that the dread of something after death, The undiscover ‘d country from whose bourn No traveler returns, puzzles the will And makes us rather bear those ills we have than fly to others that we understand not of? Therefore conscience does make cowards of us all;” (78-83) Here, he believes just of himself. He stating, “I can’t kill myself, I do not understand what will happen when I die, I’m afraid.” Then, you have Oedipus who does not think afraid of spending the rest of his life blind. After comparing Oedipus and Hamlet, it is blatantly evident that Oedipus is by far the more exceptional character of the 2.
He has essential personality type such as intelligence, empathy, and bravery which we do not see Hamlet display. We enjoy Oedipus push for the fact and do something about it at every new piece of info he stumbles upon. We view Hamlet whom already has the reality, dance around it, act mad, turn his back on his love ones and procrastinate his revenge. If you had to pick a king, who would you choose? One who is smart, smart a skilled or an unskilled procrastinator who has information and takes no action. Enough said. No Bibliography