My Opinion of Animal Farm by George Orwell

My Viewpoint of Animal Farm by George Orwell

When I first began to check out Animal Farm I thought that I would quite dislike this book. It was far from my typical reading Criteria which is usually more reasonable material, animals that can talk and pigs that can write just isn’t my cup of tea. For the first 4 chapters it was tough for me to read then a little past the fifth chapter it started to get good. The description from the Fight of the Cowbell was so vibrant and sad it truly painted a picture showing how the humans where marching towards the farmhouse and the animals charging at the humans.
One of the saddest parts of the unique, I feel, is the chapter where the pig referred to as Significant, the oldest pig, explains how jones, the farmer, treated the animals on the farm. In chapter 1 Major stateslet us face it: our lives are unpleasant, laborious, and shortand those people who are capable of it are required to work to the last atomwhen our effectiveness has actually concerned an end we are butchered with ugly cruelty(page 7). This one paragraph I felt described how vicious jones treated his animals.
Sometimes I got so exacerbated and irritated at the animals I wanted to toss my book throughout my room. How the pigs treated the other animals, cutting the other animals rations however raising their own, how Napoleon took 9 dog young puppies from their parents. I likewise got mad when Mollie the horse started to check out the surrounding farm for sugar swellings and ribbons for her hair. I felt the animals were justified when kicking Mollie off the farm. I got riled when the pigs where breaking the commandments and where altering it to conserve their own skin.
I also got disturbed when the 9 dogs Napoleon took acted as executioners, eliminating animals the pigs thought where agents of snowball and the canines would gladly rip the animals throats out. I was mystified when the pigs started to stroll on 2 legs.
I began to get frustrated when the pigs carried whips to manage the other animals and make them work faster, harder, and better. I likewise was provoked when Napoleon started to imitate a dictator and began to drink and have human interaction. I felt that the animals were better off with Jonas than with the pigs. I feel that Napoleon got rid of Snowball due to the fact that Napoleon wished to abuse the animals and make the pigs more important, while Snowball wished to make all the animals equal and just did something just if it benefited everyone equally.I think the last sentence amounts everything up: The creatures outside looked from pig to male, and from male to pig, and from pig to man once again; but currently it was impossible to say which was which.

You Might Also Like