Inspiration for “A Rose for Emily”
Inspiration for “A Rose for Emily” It is in the human nature to want to have a sense of belonging and to be a part of something larger, making it tough to keep moral choices. The main character in William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” faces ethical challenges produced by the pressure of wanting to conform to the town’s expectations while still attempting to maintain a sense of self-reliance, which ultimately leads up to the motivation to murder of Homer Barron.
By holding high expectations, straight interfering in Emily’s life and relationship, and the consistent extensive chatter from the Townspeople of Jefferson are the main motivation for the murder of Homer Barron. Emily Grierson, being the last Southern girl of the Antebellum South was held at a high expectation by the townspeople of Jefferson (Faulkner 160). As Thomas Dilworth mentions, the townspeople had actually wanted to preserve the worths of the old south through the personification of Emily (252 ).
Faulkner even states that, “Alive, Miss Emily had actually been a tradition, a responsibility, and a care: a sort of hereditary obligation upon the town (156 ).” He is indicating that the town’s people see that Emily has this hereditary task to the town. These high expectations were rollovered into Miss Emily’s personal sexual needs where she is expected to keep the look of a pure southern lady that can be compared to that of Eve from the Garden of Eden (Dilworth 253).
Although Emily does rebel against the town for 2 years by dating a blue-collar building employee and Yankee Homer Barron in attempt to not conform to the Jefferson townspeople’s expectations of a southern lady (Dilworth 251). The town’s difficult to measure up to standards are a part of the motivational reasoning that leads up to Emily murdering Homer and keeping his body in a necrophiliac relationship. Being raised by her father, Emily has actually constantly understood about the expectations that were to be fulfilled, since of who her household is; however, this means that Emily’s individual life has actually always had interference.
When her father was still alive Emily was not to be with any guy because, “None of the young men were rather good enough for Miss Emily and such (Faulkner 158),” and when her daddy finally passed away the towns individuals started to take his location in interfering in Emily’s life. After Emily has actually been dating Homer for a little over a year the town begins to suspect the couple’s relationship to be scandalous, presuming grownups in their thirties would take part in sexual acts, and leads the town to do something about it into their own hands by sending the town’s Baptist priest to speak with Episcopal Emily about her actions.
The talk with Emily was unsuccessful, causing the town to then contact Emily’s out of state cousins to monitor her. Emily in turn responds by going out into town to buy guys’s clothing and toiletries, which in turn leads the town and Emily’s cousins that she is married or is going to quickly wed Homer (Faulkner 161-162). The direct interference in Emily’s life is the townspeople blatantly displaying that they no longer have a tolerance for her relationship with Homer, and show a blind eye when Emily purchases arsenic when out in the area purchasing the men’s toiletries and clothes.
As soon as the cousins think that Emily is to marry Homer they leave, however that does not alter the reality that the townspeople straight disrupted Emily’s personal affairs and still hold Emily in high requirements. This means that even if Emily were to wed Homer the townspeople would still chatter on how Homer is a bad moral example for the Jefferson youth. Gossip was a continuous tip to Emily of the expectations required of her and the disturbance to advise her of this. Chatter is likewise consistently expressed throughout Faulkner’s story.
A direct referral of gossip originates from Faulkner’s story, “When her father passed away, it got about that the house was all that was left to her” (Faulkner 159). “It got about” is a specific referral to gossip. Also critic James M. Wallace indicates that the gossip throughout the story told by the narrator’s had a broad understanding of events that went on in the story (106 ). the storyteller relates three different discussions between Judge Stevens and one female and two guys regarding the odor originating from Emily’s property. The narrator knows the information of the discussions well enough to estimate Judge Stevens’s straight. ‘Dammit sir,’ Judge Stevens stated, ‘will you accuse a woman to her face of smelling bad? ‘” (Faulkner 158). Also earlier when Emily purchased arsenic, “So the next day all of us stated, “‘She will eliminate herself’; and we stated it would be the best thing” (Faulkner 161). “and we said it would be for the best thing,” shows how the town is judgmental and takes Emily’s “falling” as poor moral to the town. The chatter always being a constant aspect to Emily is the main factor how the town was able to inspire Emily to inspire Homer.
She understood that she would not be able to have her individual needs above the town’s expectations to hold her on a pedestal to preserve the south. The expectations, disturbance and insistent gossip from the town were the primary motivation for Emily to eliminate Homer. Emily was not able to maintain the facade of being the Southern woman that the town of Jefferson wanted while still supporting her own sexual requirements of a grown female. This leads her to the supreme decision to murder Homer Barron and keep his body for her own necrophiliac relationship to be able to put the town at ease and relax her own conscience.
The murder and necrophilia is a direct outcome of the town’s expectation, interference, and gossip and are the motivating elements needed for Emily to lastly snap.? Works Cited Dilworth, Thomas. “A Love to Eliminate For: Bloodthirsty Complicity in Faulkner’s ‘A Rose for Emily. ‘” Research Studies in Short Fiction 36 (1999 ): 251-62. Academic Search Premier. Web. 30 Dec. 2012. Faulkner, William. “A Rose for Emily.” The Seagull Reader. Second ed. Ed. Joseph Kelly. New York: Norton, 2007. 155-164. Print. Wallace, James M. “Faulkner’s ‘A Rose for Emily. ‘” Explicator 67. 4 (1992 ): 105-07. Academic Browse Premier. Web. 30 Dec. 2012.