Lord of the Flies vs. the Story of the Life of Frederick Douglass
Throughout history style has actually constantly been the vital element to composing a successful book. Today it seems if an author fails to portray his/her theme sufficiently the point of which the author is trying to communicate will be disregarded. During their professions, William Golding and Fredrick Douglass have utilized writing as a tool to communicate permeating messages and ominous cautions about our society. Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies and Douglass’ novel The Story of the Life of Fredrick Douglass both represent the loss of innocence a person may sustain while undergoing a dreadful situation.
On the surface area, these 2 books are dramatically various; a substantial element being one is fiction while the other is non-fiction. Nevertheless, a more detailed evaluation of both pieces exposes that both include common themes and concepts. Examining and comparing the two novels and their presentation of a comparable theme supplies a distinct insight into both the novels and their authors. One of the most prevalent themes in Douglass’ work is loss of innocence. He makes it very clear in the early pages of his book that slavery robbed him of his innocence.
In the opening of the unique Douglass makes it clear to the reader that he is uncertain of which the exact year he was born, because quickly after birth slaves are torn from their moms, and provided a blank life at a brand-new place. Douglass was never allowed the nurturing and playfulness that the majority of kids receive in their early stages of life. “Never ever having enjoyed, to any considerable level, her calming presence, her tender and watchful care, I received the tidings of [my mom’s] death with much the same emotions I need to have most likely felt at the death of a stranger” (Douglass).
The separation from his mother that Douglass describes was done purposely ensure that Douglass did not establish familial sensations toward his mother. He shows the reader through vibrant imagery of his experiences, how his innocence was removed from him due to the ruthlessness of his numerous various masters. Douglass dedicates large parts of his Narrative to descriptions of how servants are not born but rather made, and formed by their masters.
He discusses that servants never get the chance to grow up on their on will, and become who they wish to be, but they are rather a reflection of who their master desires them to be. If their master teaches them from the time of birth to be shy and to never question his authority that is who they will be. His entire narrative is relatively based upon that theory, and his fight to lastly rid himself of who he was sculpted to be, and become his own person.
Similarly in Lord of the Flies, Golding uses the changes in the characters of a group of young boys marooned on an Island to portray his views on how vulnerable innocence really is. Golding does a significant job at easing in to the transition of the boys personalities throughout the chapters of the novel. While checking out the novel the audience sees the kids naturally lose the innocence that they once had in the early chapters of the book. We see the children go from well acted, proper boys to bloodthirsty, apparently damned savages.
The painted savages in Chapter 3 who have hunted, tortured, and eliminated animals and people are a far cry from the carefree children swimming in the lagoon in Chapter three. But as the audience starts to notice Golding does not see this loss of innocence as something that is done to the children, however is rather the cause of their inner “evils” beginning to be set free. When the children first arrived on the island, they were still acting as though they were at home in the confinement of society and were still being required to act proper.
However as the unique unfolds the characters start to become more open within themselves, recognizing that they were the now exclusively accountable for themselves, thus enabling their savagery to naturally “blind” them. Golding implies that the civilization can sedate however never ever totally eliminate the innate evil that exists within all humans. “Ralph wept for completion of innocence, the darkness of guy’s heart, and the fall through the air of a real, wise pal called Piggy” (Golding).
These lines from completion of Chapter 12 occur near the close of the novel, after the young boys experience a marine officer, who appears as if out of no place to save them. The rescue is not a minute of indisputable happiness, for Ralph realizes that, although he is conserved from death on the island, he will never ever be the same. He has actually lost his innocence and learned about the evil that lurks within all humans. Although Lord of the Flies and The Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass share common themes, the discussion of each of the themes is different in each book.
Douglass he makes declarations by playing on his feelings, and presents his styles through subtle, however powerful stories. While Golding makes his statements by utilizing a sort of twisted humor, and using vibrant adjectives to attempt a make it possible for the audience to put themselves in the place of his characters. These authors’ objectives are to get readers to re-examine, not necessarily to change, their lives, morals, and values. Styles, such as loss of innocence, are as old as literature itself, these authors includes an unique twist to them, inviting the reader to look at these issues from a completely new point of view.