StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Love in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein - Essay Example

Summary
The paper 'Love in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein' gives a story about a scientist named Victor Frankenstein, his tragedies stemming from his creation of a human-like creature. This essay explores the premise that in some scenes, love is not sufficient to eclipse sorrow as the suffering has been greater than what love can do to ease the pain…
Download free paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.6% of users find it useful
Love in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Love in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein"

Love in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Love is present in several scenes in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. It is a story about a scientist d Victor Frankenstein and his tragedies stemming from his creation of a human-like creature. This essay explores the premise that in some scenes, love is not sufficient to eclipse sorrow as the suffering has been greater than what love can do to ease the pain. The essay also explores the possibilities of how subversion might have changed the story. Ralph Walton is the ship captain that saves Victor at sea. He describes in a letter to his sister how Victor had suffered so much that it seems he cannot recover even in the company of loving friends. Love cannot eclipse sorrow as Victor ‘is generally melancholy and despairing, and sometimes he gnashes his teeth, as if impatient of the weight of woes that oppresses him.’ (Shelley 9). Ralph begins to love Victor like a brother and is in turn saddened to see him broken by misery. Ralph asks him to relate his story so that he can see if he can be of help to him. Victor thanks him for his sympathy but says that his fate ‘is nearly fulfilled’ (Shelley 12) and nothing can subvert his situation. Victor consents to narrate his autobiography in the hope that it will guide or console Ralph. He hopes that by sharing his experience, he might aid Ralph to subvert a similar fate of utter despair. This is not a sure way of subversion but Victor says that; ‘I do not know that the relation of my disasters will be useful to you; yet, when I reflect that you are pursuing the same course, exposing yourself to the same dangers which have rendered me what I am, I imagine that you may deduce an apt moral from my tale, that may direct you if you succeed in your undertaking and console you in case of failure.’ (Shelley 12). Victor has attempted to create a living form and he neglected to correspond to his family. Love should have been present to encourage him to write home but it was not there to motivate him because he was consumed by work. (Shelley 28). Victor’s father loved him too much to reproach him for not writing but resorted to asking about the nature of his work even more. His father’s show of love could not subvert his desire of creating a living thing from nonliving components. Initially, Victor loved his creation like a father. He said that; ‘No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs.’ (Shelley 27). When the creation became alive, Victor was horrified and disgusted with himself for doing such a thing. He felt that the created creature looked ugly because he knew of the dark origins of his parts. Victor should have shown love to his creation but instead, he shunned him. The creature, like a child, came to his bed to plead for attention and care but Victor ran away. (Shelley 30). Victor does not show love to his creation when he ignored his welfare. He happens to meet his old friend, Clerval, near an inn. They return to Victor’s house and Victor was relieved to discover that his creature had left his house. As a responsible father, love should have made him worried for his child but Victor was a coward and was glad instead; ‘I could hardly believe that so great a good fortune cold have befallen me, but when I became assured that my enemy had indeed fled, I clapped my hands for joy and ran down to Clerval.’ (Shelley 32). Victor became too troubled by the consequences of his action that he fell ill and Clerval nursed him back to health. Victor cannot subvert the situation because he cannot do the necessary to show responsible love for his ‘son’. He cannot look for him nor confide in Clerval. Victor loved Clerval as a good friend but he ‘could never persuade myself to confide in him that event which was so often present in my recollection, but which I feared the detail to another would only impress more deeply.’ (Shelley 37). In other words, Victor loves Clerval but the love is insufficient to eclipse his sorrow and other troubles and he cannot confide in him. What Henry Clerval’s love could do was to restore Victor’s health and spirit. (Shelley 38). Love is still present when there is death but love is eclipsed by death’s sorrow. When Alphonse, Victor Frankenstein’s father, writes to ask him to return home to mourn his brother William’s death, Alphonse is filled with more sorrow than love. Alphonse writes that he should be happy to welcome Victor home but his loving joy is eclipsed by sorrow for William’s death. (Shelley 40). Even Clerval’s love for Victor has been eclipsed by his sorrow; he ‘endeavored to say a few words of consolation but he could only express his heartfelt sympathy.’ (Shelley 41). Love is present in Elizabeth’s and Alphonse’s responses to Justine being accused of William’s murder. Alphonse is fair and wants a fair trial for Justine. Elizabeth loves Justine and believes her innocence. Victor believes in Justine for another reason because he has seen his creature in the vicinity and suspects the creature to be the murderer. (Shelley 43-45). The family’s love for William does not eclipse their love for Justine. In the courtroom scene, love should have been present for Justine but it was not. Justine asked for witnesses to be called to examine her character but none came forward. (Shelley 48). The witnesses had known Justine for many years but their fears and hatred of the crime of William’s murder made them timid. Their fears have eclipsed their love for Justine. Elizabeth’s love for Justine urged her to speak on her behalf although she was not called forward as a witness. Her love is insufficient alone to save Justine. A priest should have love for the accused person. However, Justine’s priest has no love for her. Justine reveals to Elizabeth and Victor that her confessor (priest) threatened to excommunicate her and this forced her to confess the lie of murdering William. Justine’s love for Elizabeth and Victor cannot eclipse her sorrow at having to lie and committing herself to death. Her love makes her confess to them the truth because she does not want them to think badly of her after her death. Justine, Elizabeth and Victor have all tried to defend this case but they have failed to convince the judges otherwise. Victor suspects his creature of being the killer but he has no plans on how to deal with the creature to subvert the situations. Perhaps if Victor had contained the creature from the moment he showed animated life form, William would still be alive. Justine’s love for her friends eclipses her sorrow when she talks to them and ‘assumed an air of cheerfulness, while she with difficulty repressed her bitter tears.’ (Shelley 51). The love of the Frankenstein family members cannot eclipse their sorrows. Victor too was very upset as he ‘beheld those I loved spend vain sorrow upon the graves of William and Justine, the first hapless victims to my unhallowed arts.’ (Shelly 52). Alphonse’s love for his son Victor encourages him to console him. He tells Victor to refrain from excessive grief because it eclipses improvement or enjoyment in life. Alphonse’s love for his remaining family members cannot eclipse his sorrow over William’s death and his health deteriorates. Elizabeth was eclipsed by sorrow and was no longer happy. Victor’s conscience troubles him as his love for William and Justine makes him regret creating the creature. He blamed himself for the deaths of William and Justine. His sorrows have eclipsed his love for his own life. Victor thinks that if he had not created the creature, these situations might have been subverted. The end. Works Cited. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Publisher Project Gutenberg ebook Frankenstein, 2005. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Love in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein

Concept of Cloning in the Novel Frankenstein

The paper "Concept of Cloning in the Novel frankenstein" focuses on the critical analysis of the major peculiarities of the concept of cloning in the novel frankenstein by Mary Shelley.... All of these conjectures can be said to have started with the introduction of Mary Shelley's frankenstein, a sci-fi gothic horror novel that excited the imaginations of the post-Victorian age and continues to inspire today.... In frankenstein, the young scientist and one of the main characters are Victor frankenstein....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: A Close Reading

The third chapter of Mary Shelley's monumental novel frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus sets several key foundation stones for the rest of the story, beginning with the death of Victor frankenstein's mother, covering his move to the university at Ingolstadt and ending with the medical student deciding on his “future destiny” as the person who “unfolds to the world the deepest mysteries of creation” (Shelley).... frankenstein is not just dreamlike, but takes advantage of its firm chronological setting to enhance the haze....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature in the Real Monster

Name: Course: Tutor: Date: frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature is the Real Monster Introduction The common mistake that a reader often commit while reading Mary W.... Shelly's “frankenstein” is to assume Dr.... frankenstein's lab-made creature as a monster.... frankenstein has created, he is the real evil or the real monster.... frankenstein as a scientist who is good willed enough to discover the mystery of Nature in order to remove the imperfection is the monster; rather his disposition to abandon his creature (also his failure to socialize it) because of its ghastly appearance is the real monster in this case....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Understanding of Frankenstein's Creation

The object of analysis for the purpose of this paper "Understanding of frankenstein's Creation" is frankenstein by Mary Shelley, a book about a mad scientist called Victor frankenstein.... frankenstein is different from the other scientists because of the unique experiments he conducts.... frankenstein proved that science could be interchanged to meet several requirements.... frankenstein depicted several creatures through his laboratory experiments....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Book Report/Review

Mary Shelley's "frankenstein" appeared as a result of the ghost story contest among Lord Byron, John Polidori, Mary Shelley and her husband, occurred during the summer of 1816, when literary geniuses spent rainy evenings near Lake Geneva discussing the questions of vitalism.... Later, in her first introduction to "frankenstein," Mary Shelley explained the rationale behind the novel: "I busied myself to think of a storyone which would speak to the mysterious fears of our nature, and awaken thrilling horrorcurdle the blood, and quicken the beatings of the heart" (Shelley, 169)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Book Report/Review

Relationships towards women in XIX century: responding Frankenstein

The novel “frankenstein” by Marry Shelly was published in 1816 and is a mirror of the male and female gender roles in Victorian society.... Elizabeth is entirely dependent upon the frankenstein‘s, particularly Victor, for whom she waits for her entire life.... mary Shelly portrays Elizabeth including her own features and social stereotypes to this character.... Elizabeth is nurturing and kind, living spirit of love and patience....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

About book Frankenstein

In the novel frankenstein that was written by an author known as Mary Shelley, three stories of different characters are described to reflect the origin of how knowledge is learnt, gained, and then.... The frankenstein novel by Shelly will direct us in understanding this situation as it According to Shelley‘s novel, frankenstein involved himself in exploration of anatomy and physiology without any assistance, and as a result, he created a monster that turned out to be miserable and was rejected by the society....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Date Mel Brooks Young Frankenstein and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

The writer of the paper 'Date Mel Brooks Young frankenstein and Mary Shelley's frankenstein' states that these works are considered one of the best parodies ever created.... In the case movie Mary Shelly's, frankenstein depicts what happens black and white in contemporary society coupled with its authenticity.... This was a move to portray Young frankenstein as more scary and horror inclined in his creations (Morton 19), which in this case was the driving factor towards his success in those early years....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us