StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Euripides and Aristotle discussion about a tragedy hero - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
A perfect tragedy hero was determined by Aristotle and in the works of ancient philosophers and writers Aristotle’s claim can be discussed further on. On the example of Euripides “Medea” the basic determinants of the tragedy hero is correlated with the main character of the epic poem, Medea. …
Download free paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
Euripides and Aristotle discussion about a tragedy hero
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Euripides and Aristotle discussion about a tragedy hero"

?Euripides and Aristotle discussion about a tragedy hero Introduction A perfect tragedy hero was determined by Aristotle and in the works of ancient philosophers and writers Aristotle’s claim can be discussed further on. On the example of Euripides “Medea” the basic determinants of the tragedy hero is correlated with the main character of the epic poem, Medea. Euripides’ “Medea” found new interpretations created by Heiner Muller, Franz Grillparzer and other authors. Actually, scientists consider Euripides’ plays to be too unusual for the conservative Athenian society (Dykstal 104). In his famous play “Medea” the Euripides presented a completely new perspective on tragedy. This perspective is worth discussing, thus the given paper will define tragedy and demonstrate in what ways "Medea" can be considered as a tragedy. A lot of controversies may be found with regards to this character, but we will focus on Medea as on the collective image of female features. Both philosopher underline such features as strength, will to reach a certain goal. There is an evident different vision of the tragedy hero and we will consider these differences. Aristotle’s tragedy hero and its opposition by Euripides Aristotle claims: “Even a woman may be good, and also a slave; though the woman may be said to be an inferior being, and the slave quite worthless” (Aristotle). Thus, Aristotle tries to conceal the fact that women are initially good. Medea signifies a complicated psychological character and her vicious nature is evident. Thus, the first point of a woman’s goodness is discarded by Euripides. It is better to say that the philosopher indicates that woman’s goodness is another kind of goodness. Thus, Medea considered goodness in her actions. Killing her children in the name of revenge can be hardly considered as goodness from the objective perspective, but this action was good for her. She has her own goodness based on her own morals and principles. Moreover, Euripides contradicts with the second principle of a perfect tragedy hero. Aristotle claims about hero’s propriety, but actions taken by Medea are not appropriate at all from the perspective of the contemporaries as well as from the perspective for the ancient society. Euripides criticizes her deeds: A woman's marriage bed—    [1290]       so full of pain—how many evils, (1540)       has it brought on humankind? (Euripides) Nevertheless, Euripides shows a gradual transformation of the main hero. The second thing to reach is respectability: “There is a type of manly valor; but valor in a woman, or unscrupulous cleverness is inappropriate” (Aristotle). This position of Aristotle does not coincide with the character development presented by Euripides. Again, as Tragedy represents people who can be considered unusual, the example of Euripides shows a transformation of Medea: from being cunning fame fatal to transcendence into a selfless creature, who is neither human being nor god. In the beginning Medea says: Let no one think that I'm a trivial woman, a feeble one who sits there passively.    No, I'm a different sort—dangerous    to enemies, but well disposed to friends.                                      960     Lives like mine achieve the greatest glory.                                           [810] (Euripides) In her words we can see that this woman is full of valor. Aristotle argues that it is impossible for women to have valor. Euripides reflects this feature in the female character of Medea. Moreover, we can even suppose that Medea is a prototype of an ancient goddess Themis. She has no feelings, but takes some actions in the name of her own justice. Her own pure reason triggers her actions. The principle of the absence of cleverness among women is also denied by Euripides. Medea developed cunning strategies and then took some actions. She did not act without a proper consideration. Her ability to act with regards to her own inner emotional stimulus signifies the presence of cleverness. Thus, at this point considerations of Euripides and Aristotle do not coincide as well. The fourth point of Aristotle concerning inconsistency of the tragedy hero is also argued by Euripides. Aristotle talked about “consistently inconsistence” of the tragedy hero. Medea, vice versa, acts inconsistently. On the one hand, her actions are well-planned and consistent, but on the other hand they seem inconsistent from the perspective of detached viewers, from the generally accepted principles. Medea had her own goals. It is a sign of consistency of actions, but her transformations from a strong-willed woman and a perfect strategist. She was looking for her time, her own best time: The time for fulfillment dawns, And the golden light bathes humankind. The time of the demons is over. (60) (Euripides) Thus, we can claim that actions of Medea are inconsistent if to consider them from moral perspective, but her actions as the Sun God are consistent in the struggle against demons, who are Jason with his sons. Medea’s character interpretation is the depiction of the eternal fight between good and evil, between arguing of Euripides and Aristotle. In other words, Euripides makes an attempt to persuade Aristotle that female characters of tragedy are in a strong contradiction with the points developed by Aristotle. Euripides positions a character of Medea at different level; she is clever, cunning strategist, who tries to fight against false lives, her enemies and demons. She fights against a vicious human nature. She is an eternal fighter against Evil: I've made up my mind, my friends.       I'll do it—kill my children now, without delay,       and flee this land. I must not hesitate.       That will hand them over to someone else,       to be slaughtered by a hand less loving.                                       1460       No matter what, the children have to die.       Since that's the case, then I, who gave them life,                                [1240]       will kill them. (Euripides) Only a supernatural woman could have killed her children; it is not natural of women living in the real world; the right to give and to take away a human life belongs to God. In this epic poem this right belongs to a divine creature, Medea. An estranged position of Medea keeps her far apart from real world, from generally accepted moral and behavioral stereotypes. A fight against human vices is hardly natural of an irrational woman, who has no valor. This is an intention of a clever person, who fights for justice and not even for her own personal happiness. Medea is above emotional constraints and stereotypes; she is a critical heroine; she lives on the edge and she sees only black or white colors. Conclusion Medea’s character is not true to life. This is the contradiction with Aristotle’s claim. She is above reality and she exists in the transcendental state: she crosses the borders of womanhood; she does not consider her actions in the plane of sins; her actions are predetermined by her spiritual and divine intentions. Thus, there is an evident differentiation between the tragic hero developed by Aristotle and Euripides. Both of them position their characters as strong willed individuals with clearly set goals. Euripides tragedy hero is asexual, divine and spiritual. For Aristotle tragedy hero is close to real life and he is certainly a man full of valor and dignity. Though, we can claim that two points of these two philosophers coincide: both of them position their heroes as full of valor and consistency. Still, there is different vision of these two concepts between these two philosophers. Both of these philosophers contributed much to the development of ancient tragedy. In spite of existent differences, both of philosophers have common points and significant features of the tragedy hero are developed in accordance with the principles of strength, desire for justice, the existence above all prejudices and reaching personal goals. Works cited 1. Medea by Euripides. Web. 15 November, 2011 . 2. Aristotle. Poetics. Web. 15 November, 2011 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Euripides and Aristotle discussion about a tragedy hero Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/literature/1435803-euripides-and-aristotle-discussion-about-a-tragedy-hero
(Euripides and Aristotle Discussion about a Tragedy Hero Essay)
https://studentshare.org/literature/1435803-euripides-and-aristotle-discussion-about-a-tragedy-hero.
“Euripides and Aristotle Discussion about a Tragedy Hero Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/literature/1435803-euripides-and-aristotle-discussion-about-a-tragedy-hero.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Euripides and Aristotle discussion about a tragedy hero

Medea and Lysistrata by Euripides

In the essay “Medea and Lysistrata by Euripides” the author focuses on a 'tragedy' written by Euripides, and the latter is an 'old comedy' by Aristophanes, portray similar circumstances.... Both of these plays depict life in ancient Greece, talk about the neglect and subjugation of females.... We've got to fuss about our husbands, wake up the servants, calm and wash the babies, then give them food....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Othello an Aristotelian Tragedy and a Tragic Hero

Characteristics of a tragedy and a tragic hero B.... Abstract Shakespeare's play “Othello” is inspired by Aristotle's concept of Tragedy and Tragic Hero because the former incorporates all the characteristics of a tragedy explained by Aristotle.... Introduction Aristotle's definition of a tragedy has acted as the foundation for the creation of Tragic plays in Classical Literature.... Definition of a tragedy In order to explain the structure of drama Aristotle introduced the first literary theory in the form of “Aristotle's Poetics” explaining his understanding of tragedy and comedy and their various elements....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Examine the Role of the Chorus in Plays

The writer of this essay investigates the role of the chorus as a tool for emphasizing and pointing stress in such plays as Sophocles' "Oedipus at Colonus", "Medea", written by euripides, and "The Gods Are Not to Blame", an adaptation by Ola Rotimi.... In the play, Medea, written by euripides, on the other hand, the chorus is expressing rather a single view point, the ““normal” human reaction” to the events being played out.... rdquo; And another unique feature of the chorus of euripides in Medea has been that it is made up of only women....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

How Euripides Medea Illustrates Aristotles Elements of Tragedy

Aristotle's theory in the Poetics outlines a clear and complete description of a tragedy and its six elements.... Aristotle's theory in the Poetics outlines a clear and complete description of a tragedy and its six elements.... Contemporary authors might have an independent and specific view of a good tragedy; which could be based upon their life's experiences, personalities or attitude.... hellip; The analysis will include Aristotle's aspects of a high standard tragedy, looking at the organization of the events in the play, and the exploration Contemporary might have an independent and specific view of a good tragedy; which could be based upon their life's experiences, personalitiesor attitude....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Euripides as a Poet of Ancient Greece

The story, according to Aristotle, refers to the development being made in a tragedy and includes the incidents taking place in the drama rather than the central theme of it.... In the same way, theme simply means the main idea on which a tragedy has been created.... Aristotle looks for the sophistication and eloquence in the creation of exchange in a tragedy.... The fifth of the Aristotelian elements includes rhythm and melody in speech and diction, which turns a tragedy into a more sublime form....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Literature: Different Ways of Tragedy in Greek Drama

Additionally, the essay reveals a brief insight into what a tragedy is and how it works in literature.... In his famous play Medea, Euripides presents his own perspective of what it takes to create a tragedy.... nderstanding the meaning of Medea as a tragedy is impossible without offering a brief insight into what a tragedy is and how it works in literature.... The writer of the present essay "Literature: Different Ways of tragedy in Greek Drama" will analyze the characters of Greek drama concerning the subject of tragedy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Analysis of Euripides Hippolytus

The paper "Analysis of Euripides' Hippolytus " discusses that the ancient dramatists like Aeschylus, Ovid, Sophocles, and Euripides used mythical material selectively and altered their treatment of the mythical material to suit the purposes of high tragedy.... An important word in Greek tragedy, 'sôphrosunê', is used in this extract.... Furthermore, it is not her who brings about the catastrophe but the interference of the nurse....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Othello: An Aristotelian Tragedy and a Tragic Hero

hellip; Shakespeare's play “Othello” is inspired by Aristotle's concept of Tragedy and Tragic Hero because the former incorporates all the characteristics of a tragedy explained by Aristotle.... ristotle's definition of a tragedy has acted as the foundation for the creation of Tragic plays in Classical Literature.... So according to Aristotle, a tragedy is, “an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation of these emotions (1961, p....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us