Literary Analysis on Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” Essay

Shirley Jackson baffled the world when her narrative “The Lottery” was released in The New Yorker magazine. The piece got a good deal of negative response for its stunning and gruesome story. Readers didn’t know what or why Shirley Jackson wrote this piece. She said she wished to reveal the story with a “graphic dramatization of the pointless violence and general inhumanity in their own lives.” She wrote a piece about a town that continues the custom of eliminating one person each year for no reason aside from tradition.

The theme is to show how quickly a village of friends and family can follow ways of others, even if it is terrible and unusual. In this narrative, she shows the style with the use of irony of setting, situational paradox, and spoken irony. The comprehensive description in the narrative assists to build up an unforeseen ending. When the story begins to introduce the setting of the book it checks out, “The early morning of June 27th was clear and warm, with the fresh heat of a complete summer season day …”

The method the author writes it makes the readers seem like the story is going to happen in a delighted environment and something good is going to happen. That may appear the case but as the reader continues to read, the story is actually discussing winning a death. This irony of setting shows the delighted environment that they appear to reside in, however that is not the case once the “winner” of the lotto is stoned to death. Readers may think Mrs. Hutchinson will not get picked due to her positive attitude, however the story shows that is not the case at all. Mrs. Hutchinson imitates the drawing is not a huge deal when she shows up late stating, “Clean forgot what day it was,” and “Wouldn’t have me leave m’dishes in the sink, now would you, Joe?.” She acts as if she wants to rush the procedure and return to doing what she was doing. Mrs. Hutchinson has this attitude that she has nothing to fret about, yet it is her who winds up “winning” the lotto.

The situational irony shows that readers may believe that the lottery is no huge deal, however in fact it leads to a meaningless death. The title of the narrative is really deceptive at first. The title “The Lottery game” would make anybody assume the story is going to have to do with winning some money or some big reward. In the short story, Shirley Jackson composed, “The lottery game was conducted– as were the square dances, the teenage club, the Halloween program …” She makes the readers sense that the lottery is a typical thing and something excellent will originate from it. That is the exact reverse of what the author is portraying. To win the lottery game in the stories “village,” is to get beaten to death with stones by all individuals in the community.

The verbal paradox is when the author reveals that winning the lotto is winning a death by your loved ones, compared to the readers who hypothesize that the lottery will be something great. Shirley Jackson shows the readers how quickly friends and family turn on one another because of tradition. She mentions the paradox of setting by stimulating a great, delighted environment, but it turns out to be a significant day. With the spoken irony, nobody actually wins something; somebody ends up losing their life instead. In situational paradox, the author shows how someone can blame others for their own mistakes. All of her various kinds of paradox end up making “The Lotto” a very dramatic narrative.

Functions Pointed out
“Shirley Jackson.” Shirley Jackson and “The Lotto” N.p., n.d. Web. 04 June 2014.

You Might Also Like