Juror # 7- The Christ Figure
In the 1957 classic film, ’12 Angry Guys’, the author, Reginald Rose, represents the villain, Juror # 7, as a Christ figure. The writer’s use of a couple of obvious similarities made making the preliminary connection simple. Nevertheless, the writer’s brilliant use of unnoticeable resemblances made investigating this paper extremely pleasurable. It amazes me that an author puts in the time to tuck little morsels of indicating just under the surface area of his work. Let’s take a deeper take a look at ’12 Angry Men’.
The movie informs the story of a jury of twelve men pondering over the fate of a teenaged boy implicated of stabbing his father to death. When the jury retires to its chamber, the jury supervisor designates each juror a number according to where they were seated around the table.
The villain was sitting in the seventh chair; for that reason, he became Juror # 7. This is the very first Christ figure connection I made. The number seven is the most typically referred to number in the Bible with the exception of the number one. The number seven is utilized over 700 times in the Bible. In the Book of Revelations, it is utilized 54 times. In Hebrew it is considered the best number and represents conclusion. It is used numerous times in the Bible to represent conclusion or excellence, that to reference them all for this paper would take up its whole. In ’12 Angry Men’, the antagonist is the only juror to place a not guilty vote when the jury took its very first vote. The villain methodically breaks down the reasoning behind every other juror’s guilty vote. One by one, he exposes the underlying fears and bias of each jury member. In doing so, he produces affordable doubt. In essence, he became the kid’s rescuer. In the Book of John, Chapter 8, the story is informed of an adulteress who is captured in the very act of infidelity. In accordance with the law, the female was to be stoned to death. When asked his opinion of what the female’s fate need to be, Christ states, “He who lacks sin among you, let him toss a stone at her first.”
Then those who heard it, being driven by their consciences, left without casting a stone at the woman. In the very same method, the antagonist brings to light in each juror their own sinful nature and human weak points. The villain’s outward appearance and disposition also mirrors the manner in which Christ has been depicted throughout the history of Christianity. In contrast to the other jurors, the antagonist wears white. He is outwardly calm. He is client and never loses his mood. The setting of the film is a stuffy jury room without any air conditioning, yet the antagonist preserves an air of lightness and tranquility. On the other hand, the other jurors sweat, experience the heat and display screen flaring tempers. Among the more subtle connections I made was that the villain was an architect by trade. I knew from Bible research study that Jesus was a carpenter. It was not till I was advised to examine the etymology of the word designer that this connection became concrete. The Online Etymology Dictionary says the following:
1550’s from Middle French architecte, from Latin architectus, from Greek arkhitekton “master builder, director of works”, from arkhi- “chief” + tekton “builder, carpenter”
It remained in completion of the really last scene that our antagonist was provided a name. He introduces himself by the name of “Davis” to another juror as they are leaving the courthouse. Ironically, my maiden name is “Davis”. I presumed that the writer has a reason for doing this so I tried to find the significance of the surname Davis. “Davis” is Welsh in origin. It is a patronymic name that means, “Son of David”. In Hebrew, the name David implies “beloved”. Jesus is described as the child of David numerous times in the Bible. The following are a few scriptures from the Bible where Jesus is described as the kid of David. “As Jesus went on from there, 2 blind males followed him, crying out, “Have mercy on us, Son of David!” (Matthew 9:27) “And a Canaanite female from that area came out and began to weep out, saying, “Have mercy on me Lord, Kid of David; my child is cruelly demon-possessed.” (Matthew 15:22) “The crowds going ahead of him, and those who followed, were screaming, “Hosanna to the Kid of David; blessed is he who is available in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest!” (Matthew 21:9) The author’s depiction of Juror # 7 as a Christ figure is clear if you look at the numerous subtleties of the script. If I were to dig much deeper, I make sure there are much more to be discovered. Doing this task has been an informing experience for me. I have established the failure to take a composed artwork at its stated value alone. I will forever be turning over the stones of every story, looking for the surprise
gems of significance.