Frankenstein as an Inverse Creation Story
Tamara Rosendall Mr. VanderKolk AP Literature 19 April 2013 Who is God: The Creator or the Produced? Numerous find the popular TV program, Toddlers in Tiaras, to be amusing. Some like the program for the drama while some like watching it to see all the little girls dressed up in frilly dresses and outfits. Nevertheless, when analyzing the content of the show, one may see that the moms and dads aren’t truly the ones in charge– their prima donna daughter is. The reversed order of authority likewise plays a part in the gothic unique Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley uses the characters of Victor Frankenstein and the monster to display a contradiction to the production story in the Bible through her novel Frankenstein. Their relationship inverts the account of creation in the Bible through the developer’s view of his production, the tasks of the creator to his production, and who plays the role of God. In Genesis 1, God sees His production and acknowledges it as great. Contrastingly, Victor sees his development as wretched and evil. In the event of creating an immortal being, Frankenstein thinks that it will end up lovely and perfect.
Nevertheless, upon seeing the animal open its yellow eyes, Victor was “not able to endure the element of the being [he] had developed, [so he] hurried out of the room,” (Shelley, p. 35). He might not bear to observe the unattractive being he made, whereas in the Bible, God made male perfect and was pleased. Years after leaving from the despiteful creature, Victor stumbles into the course of the beast, whom he resolves as devil. The monster rebukes him, “you, my developer, detest and reject me, thy animal … you purpose to kill me,” (Shelley, p. 68). This reaction is in opposition to God’s response of love to Adam and His gift of eternal life to man.
In a later encounter, the animal inquires of Frankenstein why he made him in the manner in which he did. He pries, “why did you form a beast so ugly that even you turned from me in disgust? God, in pity, made man beautiful and alluring, after his own image; but my form is a dirty type of yours, more ghastly even from the really resemblance,” (Shelley, p. 93). The beast’s body is so deformed that Victor is horrified of his own development, while God developed male in His own image; for that reason, He could enjoy His development. Frankenstein detests his warped creation, however in the Bible, God enjoyed the best man that He made in His own image.
Because the designer breathes life to his created being, he has a sense of duty to that which he gave life. In the Bible, God offers food, shelter, clothing, and a companion for guy, whereas Victor leaves his creation to make it through by itself. The monster, deserted, further questions his creator about his thinkings. He makes the inquiry, “Will no intreaties cause thee to turn a beneficial eye upon thy animal, who implores thy goodness and compassion? … Am I not alone, badly alone? You, my creator, abhor me … The desert mountains and uninspiring glaciers are my refuge,” (Shelley, p. 69).
The creature is stripped of any shelter, whereas God offers the Garden of Eden for Adam. Moreover, he contests that his creator’s ruthlessness is unreasonable. He scolds, “Unfeeling, ruthless developer! You had enhanced me with understandings and passions and then cast me abroad an item for the refuse and horror of mankind. However on you only had I any claim for pity and redress,” (Shelley, p. 100). His emotions toward Victor are of bitterness due to the fact that the latter refused to also offer clothes for him, unlike God who covered Adam and Eve with animal skins. In addition, the creature refers to a book that he came across to support his points.
He debates, Like Adam, I was apparently joined by no link to any other remaining in presence; but his state was far various from mine in every other respect. He had emerged from the hands of God a best animal, delighted and flourishing, safeguarded by the specific care of his Developer; he was allowed to speak with and acquire knowledge from beings of a remarkable nature: however I was wretched, powerless, and alone. Often times I thought about Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; for often, like him, when I viewed the happiness of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me. Shelley, p. 92) The beast exposes that he knows the duty that a creator has towards his development, which Frankenstein has not satisfied any responsibility towards his animal. He continues to rebuke his creator and advises the latter of their duties to one another. He proposes, “I am thy animal, and I will be even moderate a docile to my natural lord and king, if thou wilt perform thy part, the which thou owest me … Remember, that I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam, however I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misbehaviour,” (Shelley, p. 69).
He offers an opportunity to fix their relationship, however he also reprimands Frankenstein for denying him at first. Again, the beast refers back to the book he discovered to compare to and argue that Victor has a responsibility to provide for him. He remembers the previous couple of years of his life that he lived alone and slams, No Eve relieved my sorrows nor shared my ideas; I was alone. I kept in mind Adam’s supplication to his Developer. However where was mine? He had actually deserted me, and in the bitterness of my heart I cursed him … I am an unfortunate and deserted animal; I browse, and I have no relation or friend upon earth … I am an outcast n the world permanently.” (Shelley, p. 94, 95) Frankenstein has likewise denied him the friendship that God offered to Adam in the garden. At the end of Victor’s life, he reveals that he understood of his task. He discloses, “In a fit of passionate madness I created a logical animal, and was bound towards him, to ensure, as far as was in my power, his joy and well-being. This was my responsibility … I refused, and did right in refusing,” (Shelley, p. 161). Frankenstein thinks he did the best thing in rejecting his animal any rights because he perceives the monster as hideous and harmful.
God satisfied His responsibility to humanity by attending to him; dissimilarly, Victor denies his responsibility to supply anything for his development. Finally, God has an exceptional function over His development. Although Victor Frankenstein developed the creature, the monster reigns more powerful than Victor. Beginning the novel, Frankenstein sets out to create life, playing God. He reveals his desires in stating, “”Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through, and pour a gush of light into our dark world,” (Shelley, p. 32).
Not only is his goal to create life, however he likewise describes developing light in the darkness as God carries out in the production account of the Bible. Years after the immortal being is ended up, the creator and the development cross paths. The animal questions Frankenstein, “How dare you sport thus with life?” (Shelley, p. 68). He knows that Victor handles the function of God in playing with life. Nevertheless, he goes on to mention that Victor does not play God completely. He indicates, “”Remember, thou hast made me more effective than thyself,” (Shelley, p. 8). Here, he presumes the function of the higher position, reversing the natural order of developer judgment over his creation; this likewise contrasts the Bible because God made man in a lower position than Himself. After demanding Frankenstein to produce a female buddy for him and being rejected of his request, the beast fulfils his position of authority by determining penalty on Victor. He threatens, “Servant, I previously reasoned with you, but you have shown yourself unworthy of my condescension.
Bear in mind that I have power; you believe yourself miserable, however I can make you so sorrowful that the light of day will be hateful to you. You are my developer, but I am your master;– comply with!” (Shelley, p. 122). Frankenstein now assumes the function of a slave to his own production. Therefore, the function of God having power over His production in the Bible is inverted in the relationship of Frankenstein and his creation. Comparable to the relationship of “young children in tiaras” and their parents, the role of authority is reversed in the relationship between developer and creation in Frankenstein.
In her book, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley uses the characters of Victor Frankenstein and the beast to give allusion to an inverted development account from the Bible. Their roles oppose the creation story in the Bible through the creator’s view of his production, the duties of the developer to his production, and who plays the role of God. While guy is imperfect and was not destined to create and manage, God enjoys completely and constantly will provide for His production. Functions Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 3rdrd ed. London: Colburn and Bentley, 1831. N. pag. Print.