Fahrenheit 451 Allusion to Machiavelli

Fahrenheit 451 Allusion to Machiavelli

allusion: Machiavelli Classification: Historical Quote from Fahrenheit 451: “We are all bits and pieces of history and literature and worldwide law. Byron, Tom Paine, Machiavelli, or Christ, it’s here” (Bradbury 152). Bradbury, Ray. “Part 3.” Fahrenheit 451. New York City: Del Rey Book, 1991. 152. Print. Original Source or Context: Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian historian, politician, diplomat, and thinker throughout the late 1400s early 1500s. Machiavelli is considered the daddy of modern-day political theory; and his theories are most prominent in his short book, “The Prince”.

Machiavelli’s “The Prince” is main function is to inform rulers how to remain in power once they have acquired it. The very best method to go about ruling according to Machiavelli is to simply rule well. Nevertheless if this does not work Machiavelli recommends a number of different methods such as using violence. Throughout Machiavelli’s time his theories were not extensively accepted and since of this he passed away in pity. Machiavelli acted upon his thoughts and beliefs despite what society taught and thought. Nevertheless once time passed Machiavelli’s viewpoints were much better understood and accepted.

Other theorists started take parts of his philosophy to add to their own. This brought upon a brand-new highly regarded aim to Machiavelli rather than the shameful look he died with. Citation’s from Original Source: Nederman, Cary. “Niccolo Machiavelli.” Stanford University. Stanford University, 13 Sept. 2005. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. “Niccolo Machiavelli, 1469-1527.” Niccolo Machiavelli, 1469-1527. N. p., n. d. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. Mansfield, Harvey. “Niccolo Machiavelli (Italian Statesman and Writer).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online.

Encyclopedia Britannica, n. d. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. Effect/Insight: The impact of the allusion to Niccolo Machiavelli in “Fahrenheit 451” is it connects Guy Montag to Machiavelli. Montag acted on his thoughts and what he believed in instead of what society thought in. Montag believed books were necessary to society and that the details in books had to be remembered by somebody in order to produce a much better future. The act of reading books was not accepted by society but in the future Montag would be remembered as a hero for doing so.

In the exact same sense Machiavelli’s approaches were not accepted by society however were produced in order to make life much better in the Italian city states. Machiavelli’s died in shame from his peers however was later remembered for doing great things for society. Bradbury’s function of mentioning Machiavelli in “Fahrenheit 451” was to give a reality example of what his primary character Man Montag was doing. This allusion works if the reader has an understanding of who Machiavelli is and what he contributed to society. Without knowing what Machiavelli did for society the allusion would not be effective.

You Might Also Like