Idea Picture a world with no free thought and where reading books is deemed a threat to society and the joy of its citizens. Ray Bradbury did simply this in his novel Fahrenheit 451. Concerned by the increase of innovation and the relationship in between burning books and burning individuals, Bradbury looked for to highlight the unsafe course that society is on, one that could cause mindlessness and thoughtlessness. In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury challenges thoughtlessness and promotes freethinking through the building and construction of his characters.
He uses the character of Mildred and her pals to reveal the consequences of a superficial, dumbed-down society that focuses on enjoyment, while Montag and Clarisse reveal the power and significance of free thought. Mildred exists in Fahrenheit 451 as the embodiment of the senseless society where knowledge has actually paved the way to entertainment. Mildred is the victim of a pleasure-driven society, she has been drawn into the trappings of innovation which have actually then made her dull and damaged her free idea.
Mildred is constantly watching the ‘parlour’ and calls it the ‘household’, revealing that in this society technology has actually changed genuine relationships. She listens to the seashell every night which insinuates a reliance on the technology. In truth, the very first time that we satisfy Mildred she is described as dead, “like a body displayed on the lid of a tomb.” Bradbury is showing us that technologies like tv can essentially suck the life out of us, making us dull drones.
He stresses this by mentioning that “the room was indeed empty,” which makes it seem as though Mildred no longer has any worth as a human, she is merely a pleasure-driven animal who no longer takes part in what makes us human– complimentary idea. Bradbury cleverly utilizes Mildred as a warning to us– if you permit brainless technology to dominate your life then you will end up being brainless yourself. Clarisse is used by Bradbury as a direct contrast to Mildred.
The young girl is the perfect example of a freethinking person not obstructed by the society of Fahrenheit 451. She speaks with Montag of nature and her observations about the world, along with things that Montag hasn’t even discovered like the length of billboards. At first, her honest speech shocks Montag, who is not utilized to this sort of thinking. However, shock quickly gives way to thinking of his own and he starts to question his task burning books.
Clarisse acts a driver for Montag– motivating him to think for himself and ask ‘why’ instead of ‘how’. Montag’s adoration for Clarisse is shown by the reader and allows Bradbury to promote the worth of freethinking. As Clarisse disappears and (we assume) is eliminated, the reader is required to challenge a society where discussing nature might be thought about an extreme action. Bradbury’s central character is Montag who has an essential function as a fireman in the Fahrenheit society.
At the start of the novel he likes his job– “It was a pleasure to burn,” but by the end he has killed his manager and got away from the very society he used to secure. This is a creative technique used by Bradbury, since when the enforcer begins to question the society then there should be something very wrong. Montag wants to check out books, he wishes to believe for himself. This is tough initially, he makes errors advertisement gets himself into trouble. Nevertheless, by the end he has actually made it through the destruction of the city and has eluded the Mechanical Hound.
Bradbury reveals us that Montag is not really delighted in this society– “He wore his joy like a mask”– which suggests that free idea is a fundamental part of accomplishing happiness. Or, to put it differently, that an absence of freethinking does not necessarily result in happiness. Ultimately, Montag’s desire totally free idea guarantees his survival as he has actually fled the city that is destroyed by a bomb. By the end of this unique, the reader is left questioning whether Bradbury’s predictions might become a reality, a minimum of to some degree.
He anticipated the increase of television and walkmans which, lots of would argue, are slowly degrading our propensity for free idea. He shows us really plainly through his characters what the consequences of such a society would be– mindless, thoughtless individuals who are driven by enjoyment and are not really pleased as an outcome. Novels like Bradbury’s are very important to us now because even though he was editing 50 years earlier, the ideas he puts forward are still pertinent. We should be fighting versus lack of knowledge and fighting to keep understanding at the centre of our world.