English Paper: Rhetorical Analysis of Frankenstein

English Paper: Rhetorical Analysis of Frankenstein

Mary Shelley makes us question who truly the “monster” is. Is it the creature or Victor? While the creature does commit murder, he does not understand the effects of his actions. He is like a baby who is sadly delegated learn more about the functions of society, and his place in it, on his own. He has no buddies and feels an excellent sense of isolation and desertion. The creature voices his aggravation and anger and seems to attempt to project his feelings of guilt onto Victor, as if to show him that he is the ultimate cause of the creature’s torment while he is just the victim of Victor’s manic impulse.

Shelley utilizes words, expressions, and specific tones when the creature vents his torment to Victor and this stimulates, among the readers, a sensation of empathy towards the creature and makes us cast doubt on our meanings of what monstrosity truly is. The animal is unpleasant and hurt and this can be seen through the way he talks to Victor. The animal questions “why did [he] live?” and why “because instant, did [he] not snuff out the spark of existence” (160) which Victor had bequeathed upon him.

The creature’s tone exhibits his rage about his presence and how he really wishes he might just perish and not need to live with this life that Victor has provided him. By addressing his developer, in this method, the creature seems to be trying to put the blame of his cursed and wretched life upon Victor. This makes the reader wonder regarding who actually is the beast in this book: Victor or the animal?

The animal’s tone nearly seems filled with desperation and almost like a plea to get Victor to see what a disappointing life he has actually led up until now which he too desires love and friendship. Likewise, the animal informs Victor that” [he] is harmful because [he] is miserable that he is “avoided and hated by all humanity” (169 ). It appears that the creature is attempting to impose guilt on Victor, so that he can take pity on the animal and ultimately bestow him with a mate who can assist ease the solitude the animal has faced.

The animal’s tone showed the plight he has actually suffered from and makes the reader even more sympathize with him and again ask the concern regarding who actually is the beast in the novel. While Victor is looked upon to be a regular guy while the creature is seen as a monster particularly due to the fact that of his physical appearance. At 8 feet, with an enormous body and a disfigured face, society just looks upon the animal with fear and disgust. Nevertheless, I question, could not Victor be a beast as well?

He deserted the creature in the scary of the minute and even attempts to take the creature’s life at one point. To me, the animal’s sensations of rage, vengeance, and hurt are what any “typical” human would have felt if delegated look after themselves by themselves, with no experience of love or generosity from anyone. I believe that the novel Frankenstein concerns several social conventions and norms of society, especially when it comes to our concepts of humanity and monstrosity. What makes a beast?

What makes a human? This results in the question of whether we are really human beings or beasts. Mankind tends to put a big emphasis on look and those who do not fit into this classification of the “perfect or typical physical look” are sadly most likely to be looked upon unfavorably. While we state to not evaluate a book by its cover we, in reality, do so, on a regular basis. The media plays a major role in influencing our point of view in regards to the fine line between mankind and monstrosity.

This has actually caused numerous issues, from eating disorders to high school shootings. A number of issues have actually emerged just due to the reality that physical appearance appears to be what really matters when specifying humankind and monstrosity. However, I think that it is not the physical appearance, but rather, a person’s personality and qualities that ought to specify these terms. In conclusion, Shelley makes use of particular phrases and tones to emphasize the animal’s emotions and feelings and how he tries to eventually put the blame of his guilty sensations onto Victor.

This brings into concern of who actually is the “beast” in the book: Victor or the creature. In my viewpoint the animal appears more humane than monstrous, as he experiences feelings of discomfort and loneliness which all of us can connect to at some time. It is really exceptional that within so much hatred and misery humane qualities can be witnessed and that monstrosity is not merely based on physical appearance. Functions Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. Macdonald and Scherf. Toronto: Broadview Literary Texts, 1999. Print.

You Might Also Like