Coursework – Metamorphosis Essay

Gregor must operate at a job he dislikes to settle his household’s financial obligations. The household is in debt, however he is the only one who has a job. While he wakes up early and goes on the train until late in the evening, his father has a leisurely life. Kafka writes, “for his daddy breakfast was the most essential meal time in the day, which he lengthened for hours by checking out various newspapers.” Rather of working, he is eating and checking out papers for numerous hours.

At this time, Gregor needs to work to support the whole household.

Later on, he finds out that the family has adequate cash to survive on for a few years and possibly Gregor did not have to work so hard. Kafka writes, “with this excess money, he could have paid off more of his father’s financial obligation to his employer and the day on which he might be rid of this position would have been a lot closer.” He is like a servant, and this is not natural for a family member. Changing into the insect is symbolic of being freed from this life. Because he is now a bug and can not work, he does not have to be responsible for settling the family’s debt anymore.

Rather, the family needs to be accountable. Therefore, the transformation is also symbolic of the household being freed since they do not depend upon Gregor anymore. They depend on themselves for assistance. After the change, the mom and sibling should do the cooking and the family need to all get tasks. Once that occurs, the household quickly decides that they do not want or require Gregor any longer. They are independent and decide that Gregor is not an important part of the family. Question 2: If the story was set in modern America and Gregor was working 2 jobs, the plot would change in numerous methods.

If he is working two jobs, it is probably due to the fact that they are barely able to pay the financial obligations. The family would currently be working, they would not get brand-new tasks so quickly, and there would be no servant lady or guests. If Gregor had two tasks, the other family would probably be working too. This would change the plot substantially. If all the household is working, Gregor would not be the only one accountable for the financial obligations. After the metamorphosis, the family would not have adequate cash. If they are already working and Gregor loses 2 jobs, the family would be more in debt every day.

Likewise, in the story, the household starts working right after Gregor is changed to an insect. Nevertheless, today it is not so easy to get a job like in the story. If the household needs to get new tasks, it would take a long time and their financial obligations would be greater. In addition, there would not have been a servant in the story. Kafka writes, “The servant girl was now let go. A huge bony cleaning woman with white hair flying all over her head was available in the early morning and night to do the heaviest work. The mother took care of whatever else in addition to her considerable sewing work.

” If Gregor was working two tasks, the family would not have a servant woman or household help. They would not have adequate cash and the family would do this work themselves. Likewise, the household gets rent from 3 lodgers. Today, lodgers are not so common so the family would be required to find other ways to get money. The story does not state if the rent is a great deal of money, however one of the family would need to get another task to replace the lease. Question 3: I investigated “The Transformation” and found 2 excellent resources: 1. The Modern World. 16 Mar. 2007 <. This site is a collection of info about Franz Kafka and "The Metamorphosis." It has a biography, review of the story, and a collection of other resources like documents, research, and websites. 2. Blossom, Harold, ed. Franz Kafka's the Metamorphosis. New York City: Chelsea House, 1988. This is a book with lots of essays about "The Metamorphosis." I read "Transformation of the Metaphor" by Stanley Corngold and "From Marx to Myth: The Structure and Function of Self-Alienation in Kafka's Transformation" by Walter H.

Sokel. In “From Marx to Myth: The Structure and Function of Self-Alienation in Kafka’s Metamorphosis,” Walter H. Sokel writes Gregor becomes an insect because he has self-contempt. Sokel writes, “Seeing himself as vermin, and being dealt with as such by his organisation and household, the traveling salesman Gregor Samsa literally becomes vermin” (105 ). I agree with the author when he states vermin represents the method Gregor is dealt with, but I do not agree that Gregor sees himself this way.

Gregor does not like his job, but should go to work to “pay off my parents’ financial obligation” to his boss. His household uses him because he can generate income and pay off the debts. His employer utilizes him due to the fact that he can generate income for the business. Kafka blogs about Gregor, “He was the one in charge’s minion, without backbone or intelligence.” He can not even miss out on work if he is sick. He definitely is treated like vermin by his household and manager. Nevertheless, I do not see that Gregor thinks he is vermin until after he becomes a bug. He seems to be proud that he supports his family.

You Might Also Like