Catcher in the Rye Analysis

Catcher in the Rye Analysis

The plot is constructed around aimless throwing around the city of a boy with a memorable name Holden Caulfield, who is a really fascinating individual. In reality, it contains all the youth aggression and intentional fallout from the surrounding “system”. The book begins with Caulfield being kicked out of a distinguished school for failure. Not that he was a bad student– he’s wise and might continue training, however he was sickened by the spirit of the school, prudish and hypocritical. Holden sees these two qualities literally in whatever, not just in school– from his good friends and sweethearts to casual associates. However, he knows that he is little bit different from them, and it is very dismaying. He comprehends that he is unable to change anything– the only thing he can do is to show an implicit protest versus the order of things without actively doing anything. That’s the factor for his absenteeism, the continuous lies, contempt for guidelines and policies, amounting at times to hysteria. Holden has no worth in life, other than for an extremely unclear concept of how things should be. A vibrant image of his dream, the important things that he might do without loathing:

— … You know, I imagined like youngsters playing in the evening in a huge field in the rye. Countless young children, and around-nor souls, nor one grownup, other than me. I’m basing on the edge of a cliff, over a precipice, you understand? And my task is to catch the kids so they do not fall into the void. You know, they play and they do not see where they’re going, and then I run up and I catch them so they do not fall off. That’s all my work. See the people over the abyss in the rye. I understand it’s dumb, however it’s the only thing I actually want. I must be foolish.

Unusual dream, but something about her actually is … Conserve the kids of those creatures, yet so despiteful hypocrisy and narcissism, which Holden sees in all people– away from everything, over the endless void …

My brother suggested the book to me for reading, and when we both got acquainted with it, it became the topic of our long disputes. Bro says Holden related, to some degree, he saw it himself, saw and accepted. He completely supports him. And I, no matter how interesting to me nor was the character, I can not share his views. Holden, in my opinion, is really hanging over the abyss, however are under the danger of not playing in the rye, children, and himself. Yes, it has everything that was and is in us, in the youth– the spirit of the rebel, renunciation of authority, the desire for uncountable provided– however it is all blind forces that without a bridle can destroy not just ourselves, however likewise those who are close to us. Firstly, the book taught me not to be like Holden Caulfield, not to despair in worths, even if they are disliked by us and appear banal. I am not saying that we need to not rebel and attempt to alter the surrounding realities. Just need to do it “without brakes”, and purposeful, starting with small, clearly mindful of himself, not declining everything. To develop, not break. In the end, Salinger himself states by the mouth of among the interlocutors of Caulfield, and this expression ended up being for me the primary of the entire piece:

An indication of immaturity of the individual that he wishes to die nobly for a cause, but a sign of maturity that he wishes to live humbly for a cause.

You Might Also Like