Argumentative Paper, of Mice and Men

Argumentative Paper, of Mice and Guy

In the end of the unique Of Mice and Guy by John Steinbeck, among the primary characters, George, killed his pal Lennie because he thought it was what’s finest for Lennie. Lennie had gotten in difficulty on the ranch by accidently killing the other half of a male named Curley. After this event Lennie entered into concealing like he was told by George if he were to get in trouble. George then discovers Lennie and calms him down and shoots him in the head when he understood Lennie enjoyed and calm by discussing his dream. There are arguments on whether George made the ideal decision to kill Lennie at the end of the novel.

The reasons for George to kill Lennie outweigh the reasons for George to let Lennie live, this might be an outcome of people concluding that George made the ideal choice in the end to kill Lennie. Through the text in the unique reader could infer what the characters were believing by evaluating the actions taken. Although Of Mice and Men is composed in a 3rd person unbiased perspective, the structure of the book made it easy to presume the ideas of the characters. With eliminating Lennie, George knew that Lennie would not remain in threat by the guys on the ranch.

Many of the employees on the ranch teamed up with Curley after discovering Curley’s wife dead by the fault of Lennie and they were going to hunt him down in revenge. If Lennie were to live, both George and Lennie would be living on the run since they consented to stick to each other no matter what. If Lennie were not to be eliminated by George and one of the guys on the ranch went after him, Lennie might become too scared and could potentially eliminate somebody else in the way the scene with Curley’s better half unfolded. Lennie did not comprehend the strength he can when he becomes scared.

For instance Curley’s wife was struggling and he inadvertently snapped her neck when we was trying to relax her down. If among the guys on the cattle ranch pursued Lennie he could perhaps injure somebody else while attempting to safeguard himself. When George decided to eliminate Lennie the reader can presume that he would rather kill Lennie as a best friend than have actually Lennie eliminated by someone else in hate and revenge. The reader can conclude that this is what George wanted by connecting this occasion back to when Sweet’s old canine was put down by Carlson.

Sweet informed George that he wishes that he could go back and put his pet down himself so that his dog would not have actually been so scared in the end. This event foreshadows Lennie’s death and the audience can conclude that this event persuaded George to eliminate Lennie himself. George was given the chance to calm Lennie down and put Lennie in his happy location, talking about his dream tending to the bunnies. George wanted Lennie to be happy right prior to he passed away so that he could have the opportunity of letting Lennie feel protected and safeguarded unlike the experience with Sweet’s old pet dog.

After eliminating Lennie the reader can infer that George might carry on with his life and pursue his dreams, although this is not the primary factor George eliminated Lennie. There were many reasons for George to kill Lennie as opposed for him to let Lennie live. The factors behind the choice is in between the text and the audience needs to make their own conclusions to why George eliminated Lennie. There are more factors for George to kill Lennie then for him to let Lennie live so this might have influenced George for the logical choice that eliminating Lennie was the ideal thing to do at the end of the book.

You Might Also Like