Analysis of Irony in The Crucible

Analysis of Irony in The Crucible

Irony is an outcome of events that contrasts what was or what might have been expected. “The Crucible,” composed by Arthur Miller, catches the sensations and feelings of genuine people that were implicated of witchcraft in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692. Irony within the drama, shows how innocent people might lead to becoming anxious and afraid due to being charged with criminal activities they did not dedicate. Paradox effects this play due to the fact that it develops stress and anxiety and stress within the most important scenes.

A strong belief within the conservative, Puritan neighborhood was that children must be seen and not heard. One of the Puritan ministers, Reverend Parris, supported this belief: “He regarded them as young people, and till this weird crisis he, like the rest of Salem, never ever conceived that the children were anything however grateful for being allowed to walk directly, eyes somewhat reduced, arms at the sides, and mouths shut up until bidden to speak,” (Miller 4).

Regardless of this thought, Abigail Williams and the young girls of Salem were the “stars” of the lawsuit convicting people of witchcraft. They were the primary witnesses and regularly used spectral evidence to frame innocent individuals in the town. While in the court, the girls screamed, acted out, and did anything imaginable to end up being the center of attention, and to convict as lots of people as possible. Since the town of Salem thought these ladies were bewitched, their habits became appropriate, in spite of their previous Puritan beliefs.

As a result of all these critical occasions, stress was developed within the court in between the ladies and individuals of Salem. Towards the beginning of the drama, John Proctor commits infidelity by taking advantage of Abigail. When questioned by Reverend Hale to recite the 10 Rules, he remembers all other than the sin of infidelity. This results in Proctor sensation guilty, distressed, and not being able to forgive himself for his fault. Instead of confessing his sin, he uses the reason, “You see, sir, in between the two of us we do understand them all.

I believe it be a small fault,” (Miller 71). John explains that with Elizabeth’s help he could provide all ten, and that it was simply a small error for forgetting the last rule. Proctor can not confess to himself and others that it was paradoxical he forgot such a thing. Since of the adultery and this occasion between Proctor and Reverend Hale, tension with Abigail and the fear of the sin being publicized is developed; John continues to become more distressed over the occurrence. While in court, Judge Danforth questions Elizabeth about whether John Proctor is a lecher or not.

Although constantly portrayed as a truthful lady, Elizabeth lies to attempt to maintain her other half’s name in the town of Salem. She describes to Danforth, “I concerned think he fancied her. And so one night I lost my wits, I think, and put her out on the highroad,” (Miller 118). Previously in “The Crucible,” she makes John admit his sin to her, yet she chooses to not admit the same information to the court. John had already admitted it, but Elizabeth was not aware of this and chooses to lie rather. She also dislikes Abigail, yet this lie conserves Abigail’s reputation in order to save her partners name.

As soon as she misleads the people of the court, more stress and anxiety is developed, and Elizabeth is thought as a witch despite the fact that she was constantly well appreciated in Salem. “The Crucible,” demonstrates how paradox can be utilized to create stress and anxiety and stress within the most critical scenes and between some of the most crucial people. Arthur Miller uses this strategy numerous times in order to get the audience more emotionally involved with the characters and their feelings. This design of writing connects individuals to the plot of The Crucible and will hopefully avoid a scenario like this from taking place again.

You Might Also Like