Analysis of Frankenstein’s Innocence: From Innocence to Evil

Analysis of Frankenstein’s Innocence: From Innocence to Evil

Analysis of Frankenstein’s Innocence: From Innocence to Evil Prompt 7 Dr. Victor Frankenstein’s creation in Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, was at first innocent and became corrupt throughout the book (Introduction xxxii). This is revealed through the beast’s desire for love and approval, believing he can only get love through fear, and him blaming Victor for his evil methods. Victor Frankenstein created life with just the very best intents. He himself, felt that he “be [gan] life with good-hearted intents” (93 ).

He wanted to prove that his theories about how life can be performed were more than mere theories. Frankenstein’s monster desired love and approval from the very beginning of his production. The monster demonstrated this human necessity due to the fact that he adapted the qualities and attributes that he had when he was living the very first time. The monster felt awful when individuals would range from him out of terror or when people would take a look at him like he was a disgrace to all humanity. The beast went through much avoiding and discrimination that it began to press him to his breaking points.

He felt as if society would never ever have a place for him and the only way in which he would ever be liked is if Victor created him a mate as awful as he was. This is demonstrated by the beast telling Frankenstein, “I am alone and miserable. Only somebody as ugly as I am could like me.” (137 ). The monster was rejected the mate he so longed for. “Shelley’s Frankenstein shows a typical belief that when guys leave desires for love and accomplishment unguarded versus fascination, evil perverts pure motives and produces devastating consequences.” (Wengerd).

After being denied the one thing that might end what appeared like an unlimited nightmare for Victor, the beast pertained to recognize that the only way to gain love was through creating fear. The monster watched the quaint little household from the town over and was accepted by the blind man and child, due to the fact that their hearts were full of compassion and no judgments, but once the daddy of the child saw him the entire scene changed. The daddy had plenty of hate for the monster who he did not understand and the beast was no longer wanted based upon his look. The beast was left alone indulging his sensation of betrayal and anger.

The emotions take hold and easily he gives up his innocence in a rage fueled vow. “I swore everlasting hatred and vengeance to all humanity” (Shelley 81). Frankenstein’s beast had stated, “Did I demand thee, Maker, from my clay? To mold me Guy, did I solicit thee, from darkness to promote me?” (Intro xxxi). The message that is being shared through this passage is that the monster views him as an awful figure, comparing himself to both Adam (Adam and Eve) and Satan. Like Adam, the beast is avoided by his developer, though he aims to be good.

These rhetorical questions characterize the monster’s ill will toward Victor for abandoning him in a world non-stop hostile to him and foist obligation for his ugliness and ultimate evil upon Victor. Considering that Victor does not try to do the will of his production, though his dreams are constructed with good intent, he puts himself, others, and his household at risk. He states, “If I can not influence love, I will cause fear!” (187 ).? Functions Cited: Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.

You Might Also Like