How does Rose utilize structural aspects to reinforce his assessment of the judicial system? Rose uses the structural aspects of the play to advance his position, critiquing the flaws of the judicial system. 12 Angry Guys takes place in ‘real time’, which permits the play’s characters to additional establish and creates a sense of realism. The characters of the play are agent of the play’s message, that decisions such as the one the jurors should make are essential, and can not be seen with lethargy and left.
The apathy and prejudice that most of the jurors possessed when they initially made their decisions is something that Rose intended to criticise, as this very same passiveness and prejudice was plainly in 1950’s society, and may divert the judicial processes. In the beginning, the 8th juror is the only one who feels compassion for the boy being persecuted, believing that if he is to be sentenced to death in an electrical chair then his case a minimum of needs to be treated with compassion and care, instead of thoughtlessly putting the case behind in the quickest fashion and proceeding, from apathy or bias.
Throughout the play the jurors realise that this is something they can not leave, that they can not get away from, and something that they must dedicate themselves to, they understand that the life of a young, poor boy, who resided in the shanty towns and struggled with a violent and extreme youth is more important than what lies beyond the courtroom doors, and the fact that not just does the play happen in ‘real time’, but also largely occurs in one setting, even better, one space, just communicates this sensation of the realisation that lethargy is not the service.
They are trapped, separated from the flexibility of their lives, and the apathy or prejudiced that may have belonged of their lives, and confronted with the care they need to have for the life of another person.
The bathroom exists as an escape for them, a place for their real ideas, where even the passiveness and hatred within them may return, but in the end it is linked the private space in which they vote, in the end they can not merely choose whether a boy lives or passes away based upon that same apathy or hatred, it should be a lengthy and essential process that should take into account the truths and the gravity of their decision, and not be influenced or diverted by the views of the people making that decision.
Rose thinks that the judicial system is flawed, yet by producing characters such as the 8th juror, the lead character and likewise the first dissenter, he likewise believes that the judicial system is one that would be able to operate with a treatment of compassion, seriousness and significance. By having the characters all alter their choice, through compassion and the realisation of the importance of their vote, he recommends that this is the service, rather than the personal lives, views or beliefs affecting and making the decision in a judicial procedure, in particular, one as serious and ruthless as the one in the play.