12 Angry Men Prejudice Essay Essay

What is Justice? Justice is a concept of moral rightness based upon principles; rationality, law, religious beliefs or fairness, as well as taking into consideration the inborn rights of all human beings and residents, the right of all people and individuals to equivalent security prior to the law of their civil rights, without discrimination. Justice is one of the fantastic concerns of mankind. It is something for which individuals over centuries have actually wanted to battle and even die.

Examples of Justice are novels 12 Angry Men and The Green Mile.

2 Angry Men is a novel written by Reginald Rose in 1955. The story occurs in 1957 in the jury-room of a New York Court of Law. It has to do with a young overdue who is on trial for the murder of his aggressive farther. Eleven jurors are directed by the judge to gather on a hot afternoon to state if there is any affordable doubt as to why the kid is not guilty. One, despite the fact that far from convinced of the kid’s innocence, feels that a few of the proof versus him is ambiguous.

By the end of the day that juror has reversed viewpoints of all eleven jurors.

Bias: There are many considerable views and values that Reginald Rose shows in 12 Angry Guys the most important one being that prejudice constantly affects the fact and peoples judgement. As the jurors argue in between themselves regarding whether a young boy is guilty of stabbing his dad it is revealed that “It’s very hard to keep personal bias out of a thing like this.” This is most apparent in the way juror # 3 and juror # 10 come to their choice that the young man is guilty as they generate there prejudice versus young people and people from the shanty towns to make their judgement without thinking about the truths of the case.

Rose utilizes juror # 8 who can see the entire trial due to the fact that he is calm, affordable and brings no bias as a prime example of what a juror is supposed to be like. Juror # 10 is the character who generates the most prejudice to the jury room as he has actually formed his choice from the minute he saw the young boy and sees no reason for him to waste at any time discussing on whether the accused is guilty. His prejudice originates from the fact he used to reside in the “slums” and consider individuals like the defendant to be garbage.

This is developed when he mentions “you can’t believe a word they say … they act various … they do not require any huge excuse to kill somebody.” Juror # 10 never ever actually thinks about the facts of the case just utilizing them as a pretext to vote guilty and to leave early. When he found it too challenging to change individuals’s opinions he merely gave up and voted not guilty. “I couldn’t care less”. This reveals just how little he looked after the accused’s life and the jury system unlike juror # 3 who deeply appreciated the jury system and the case.

You Might Also Like