12 Angry Men: Jury’s Conflict Involved on Verdict Essay

Any jury trial is bound to have some sort of conflict involved when concerning a decision. The portrayal of a murder case in the motion picture, 12 Angry Men, includes many different examples of dispute, as well as the methods to conflict used by various characters. Almost every discussion in the movie includes dispute, considering that the characters are all disputing whether or not the boy being pursued murder is guilty or not, however there are a couple of scenes in which various kinds of dispute and various techniques to conflict seem to stand apart.

The space in which the guys are sitting and discussing the case has a table with each of the men relaxing it. Jury member primary, who sits at the head of the table, handles the function as the leader of the conversation by formatting how the voting goes and asking all members whether they accept any choices made. In one scene, the older guy with the summertime cold comes over to jury member number one and tells, “stop being a kid.

K. I. D. Kid.” Jury member primary reacts, “Just because I am attempting to keep this thing arranged? Here, you take the responsibility. I’ll just keep my mouth shut, that’s all.” This scene is an example of Ego/Identity conflict due to the fact that of the beliefs that the man with the cold see’s jury member number one as being a kid because he is more youthful than him. Jury member primary appeared to take the duty of leading the group just because of his number, but the man with the cold appeared to get upset and create a conflict with him since of his age.

See more: Social Satire in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Essay

The different kinds of characters in the jury decision produce several examples of techniques to dispute. Jury member number two, the peaceful guy with the glasses, becomes the target of a number of the other characters. When the men are all walking around and discussing their factors for why they feel the kid is guilty, Jury member number 3 interrupts and states, “what about the switch-knife discovered in the man’s chest?” Jury member number two says, “Wait a 2nd, there are some people who haven’t talked yet, should not we enter order?” Jury member number three states, “forget about the people who haven’t gone yet, be quiet will ya?” This causes jury member second to peaceful down and not respond. This technique to conflict is an example of contending because of the win-lose result of the dispute. Jury member number 3 makes sure that he uses his alpha male status and closes down jury member second with no grievance.

The last scenario is an example of conflict in addition to the approach to conflict. When the males choose to make a confidential vote and one of them writes “innocent” on the paper, jury member number 3 calls out the male who had actually grown up in the shanty towns and says that he changed his vote because he succumbed to the preaching of the first member who felt the young boy was innocent. After chewing out the man, the old guy finally admits to altering is vote. Later, jury member number three efforts to apologize for calling out the guy who grew up in the slums and he simply strolls right past him without reacting. This is an example of Ego/Identity dispute because jury member number 3 judged the guy who grew up in the slums and anticipated him to change his vote because of his past. The approach to the dispute later on is avoidance because the man who grew up in the shanty towns selects to not respond to the apology and walk best past the man without getting into any kind of conflict.

You Might Also Like