12 Angry Men – Juror Number Eight

12 Angry Men– Juror Number Eight

Juror number 8 is the main lead character, he likewise a booked with his thoughts, yet extremely strategic with them. He is the defender of the down trodden victim. He has a calm rational method to whatever and he reveals the spaces in the statements positioned against the offender.

These examples would be; that the old male could not have seen the young boy run out of the house, as the old man had a limp and for that reason could not make it to the door in time. The old woman across the roadway could have never saw the kid stab his father, due to she wasn’t wearing her glasses and it was pitch black.Number eight is a male that withstands the illogical and dangerous individuals of the jury. This is revealed through number eight and juror number three, they have an argument about juror three pulling the turn on the young boy. He says “For this kid? You wager I ‘d pull the switch” juror eight then calls him a “self- appointed public avenger” which stuns juror number 3. Justice is the most important theme throughout this play. It shows that truth can’t be found without a struggle.

In the play there was just one juror wanting to hear all the evidence in the court case.But when more truths were found out then some of the other jurors wished to hear the rest of it, which would determine whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty. No one really understood if the young boy was guilty but or not however they found out that he was not given a fair trial. The defence barrister didn’t care due to the fact that he wasn’t getting paid sufficient money to care. So that’s what the jurors thought it was up to them then, to repay the kid with justice. Juror number three is a big-headed, self-minded and very unclear has actually had an individual experience in his life, that’s why he desires the boy dead.His child escaped from a battle when he was 9.

” I saw him. I was so ashamed I nearly tossed up.” Then when he was older the kid then hit him in the face and he has actually never seen him since. This puts a pre- judged view inside of his head. In the end he thinks to himself that it is not his kid that is on trial for that reason he can not treat him like that. He can’t dislike all teens since of his son. Juror number 10 is similar to number three in the way he considers the whole lawsuit.

There was no getting across him. He too was arrogant and extremely independent.He always needed to be best about everything he stated. In his case he is simply down- right racist. He thinks that every Puerto Rican is guilty which they all must be eliminated. Ignorance is revealed through all the jurors at some stage throughout the play. The case is demanding and if they made the wrong choice then a poor innocent teenager would be sent out to the chair to be eliminated for something he never devoted to.

Juror number seven reveals this when he changes his vote to innocent just for the sake of getting it over and made with so he could go to his ball game.

You Might Also Like