StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Situation in Syria Is Marked by Conflict - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Situation in Syria Is Marked by Conflict" describes that the US plays a significant role in counter-terrorism and the fight against violation of human rights. National interests provide the major pillar for the involvement of the United States in the mitigation of foreign crises…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.2% of users find it useful
The Situation in Syria Is Marked by Conflict
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Situation in Syria Is Marked by Conflict"

CONFLICT IN SYRIA al Affiliation) US National Security Council (NSC) Official Briefing: the National Security Adviser on why Rebel Groups may take control of Parts of Syria The United States was under obligation to reshape the long-standing policy developments that she had over the Syrian conflict in the summer of 2014 after the insurgent ISIS launched an offensive in the neighboring Iraq. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, better known as ISIS have control of vast regions of the northeastern parts of Syria. It is in this region that the resurgent Islamic state continues to launch attacks against the forces aligned with and opposed to the Bashar al Asad government. This fighting is rampant in the entire Syria, hence outlining the Syrian conflict as that pitting the foreign allies and the government against the groups of insurgents who are mainly against the government (Syrian conflict spills into cyberspace, 2013). Since the end of the World War II, the context of International Relations to the United States has transformed largely. The nation being the world’s superpower has the mandate to maintain this position by asserting its influence on global issues that define the nature of global cohesion. Therefore, the conflict in Syria, as experienced in other nations such as Libya and Iraq, requires the intervention of the United States. Through the National Security Council, the National Security Advisor of the Head of State reviews the situation in Syria, mapping out the possible implications of the ongoing conflict in accordance with the traditional American viewpoint of International Relations (Choi and James, 2014). The Syrian Conflict may encounter the rebels taking control of most parts of the country because certain foreign forces allied to the ISIS rebels continue funding this movement. Due to the barbaric use of chemical weapons by the Syrian leader on the people of that country, many countries have expressed their solidarity against the leader. This unity between the foreign countries and the radicals empowers the rebels through offering them advanced weapons and funds to fight against the oppression endured by the innocent citizens. In response to these actions, the United States Security Council decided that the United States needs to conduct limited attacks against the Syrian leadership. The U.S holds the mantle for being the most democratic state, and believes that it is the obligation of each government to protect their citizens. Therefore, the choice to join the Syrian government in fighting ISIS will be an indication that U.S supports oppression, while the collaboration with rebel forces will insinuate that the U.S is a state that does not recognize the leaders chosen to represent a people. The Realists believe that each nation pursues its individual interests towards attaining regional and global security and power. The involvement of the United States in the conflict in Syria is a bid by the country to end the war and restore significant semblance of peace in the region. Therefore, power equals peace. In the view of the Syrian conflict, the realist notion contributes to the escalating dominance of the rebels against the government. Driven by the assumption of more power more peace, the rebels derive a fighting course that strengthens their frameworks within the region (Maness and Valeriano, 2015). The Syrian government on the other hand is mainly dealing with suppressing the rebellious forces, with no major fighting course. This explains why the rebels have the ability to take control of other parts of Syria. While the army is bent on ambushing the rebels’ strongholds, they leave the other parts of the country insecure, therefore posing a threat of takeover of these insecure regions by the insurgent ISIS. Being that the Assad Regime in Syria holds a tremendous hazard of its chemical weapons around the world, the United States views this as a threat to the national security. Chemical weapons are lethal and can destroy many human lives in a single attack. Many countries in the world, like the United States, express their worries about irresponsible leaders having possession of chemical weapons. Therefore, many nations will at all costs fight the growth of these weapons in the Syrian arsenal, and assert more influence against the use of these weapons by strengthening the rebels. The collaboration of these nations with the rebels against the use of chemical weapons is a recipe for growing strength of the rebels in Syria, hence their expansion into other territories within the country. In addition to that, the gains that the Islamic State registers in Iraq are a possible indication of the continuous flow of fighters and weapons into northeastern Syria. The rebels have a strong base in Iraq, ironically supported by a majority of the Iraqi citizens. Iraq represents a training base for the youthful recruits who go into the battle zones to fight for the infamous Islamic course. The inflow of these fighters backed by superior weapons, poses a threat to the Syrian Army to contain these factors (Armed Conflict Work Group of the In, 2013). The continued efforts by the United States to talk the Syrian leader into stepping aside further encourage the course of the rebels. Stepping into the conflict is an ultimate way that the United States uses to ensure that the Middle East region endures peace and overcomes the violation of human rights by the Syrian government. Nonetheless, the calls for a transitional government strengthen the Islamic State rebels, further encouraging them to push their agenda forward because their impact is evident in other countries. Furthermore, the strengthening bilateral ties between the Syrian government and the Iraqi government concerning the coordination on how to fight the militants encourages the ISIS leaders to unite further against the Syrian regime. Since the early stages of 2014, the ISIS rebels have put more emphasis on securing the Northeastern parts of the Syrian territory. This dominance has created a constant supply link between the Eastern Syria and the western part of Iraq, with the rebels gaining more confidence on invading other parts of Syria. The reluctance by the Syrian government to attack this region has led to the militants drawing plans on how to attack the Western parts of Syria. The government forces, however, have distinct operation in Western Syria. This concentration on one part of the territory poses a potential risk to the government as the rebels’ army grows and strategizes on how to capture these regions from the government. The Assad Government plays a critical part in the spread of the Islamic State rebellions in the Syrian territory. The government has not devoted a significant amount of resources to stabilize the situation by combating the rebellious groups. Despite assistance from the allied members, the Syrian government has continuously failed in allocating enough work force and machinery to guard the spread of the insurgency. This is in part due to the government notion about the opposition, which states it is dominated by extremists (Maoz, 2014). The government is satisfied about the insurgent attacks on other anti government groups. The complete reluctance by the government to tame the ISIS operations in northeast Syria appears to benefit the rebels. The elections held in Syria ensured that Assad had a third consecutive seven-year term in charge of the war torn country. This win, in the view of the European Union, the United States and the Syrian opposition, was illegitimate and marred by constitutional irregularities. The disregard of democracy by the Syrian leader in the electioneering process is a contributor to the spread of the Islamic state in other parts of Syria. Gaining support of major superpowers in the world against condemning the vote is a boost for the Islamic State to fight more for the liberation of the people. Liberalists, however, believe that it is important to embrace dialogue in conflict resolution. The formation of special tribunals to find an amicable solution, according to the United States policies, indicates the determination of the country to defend the national interests in democracy (Gifkins, 2012). Since the brutal violence begun in Syria, the United States has employed a diplomatic approach to solving the problem. The warring parties have been invited to negotiating tables, with the political situation being a complete factor in driving these talks. Nevertheless, the United States believes that full recognition of the solution of this brutality lies in political mitigation between the conflicting factions. The country, therefore, has collaborated with numerous European allies to impose comprehensive and robust sanctions on the Syrian leadership. The United States has also championed for the formation of a United Nations Commission of Inquiry that will look into the situation in Syria (Webb, 2014). This is part of the larger policy to include other global nations in reaching a unifying decision in dealing with the atrocities and violations in Syria. The U.S publicized the warnings against the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian leader, through Iran and Russia. With the above approaches bearing minimal advances, the United States settled on the employment of limited military strikes. In conclusion, the United States plays a significant role in counter terrorism and fight against violation of human rights. However, the national interests provide the major pillar for the involvement of the United States in mitigation of foreign crisis. References Armed Conflict Work Group of the In, (2013). Armed Conflict: A Model for Understanding and Intervention. Death Studies, 37(1), pp.61-88. Choi, S. and James, P. (2014). Why Does the United States Intervene Abroad? Democracy, Human Rights Violations, and Terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Gifkins, J. (2012). The UN Security Council Divided: Syria in Crisis. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(3), pp.377-393. Maness, R. and Valeriano, B. (2015). The Impact of Cyber Conflict on International Interactions.Armed Forces & Society. Maoz, M. (2014). The Arab Spring in Syria: Domestic and regional developments. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 7(1), pp.49-57. Syrian conflict spills into cyberspace. (2013). Computer Fraud & Security, 2013(9), pp.1-3. Webb, P. (2014). Deadlock or Restraint? The Security Council Veto and the Use of Force in Syria.Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19(3), pp.471-488. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“US National Security Council (NSC) official briefing the National Essay”, n.d.)
US National Security Council (NSC) official briefing the National Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1694227-us-national-security-council-nsc-official-briefing-the-national-security-adviser-on-why-rebel-groups-may-take-control-of-parts-of-syria
(US National Security Council (NSC) Official Briefing the National Essay)
US National Security Council (NSC) Official Briefing the National Essay. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1694227-us-national-security-council-nsc-official-briefing-the-national-security-adviser-on-why-rebel-groups-may-take-control-of-parts-of-syria.
“US National Security Council (NSC) Official Briefing the National Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1694227-us-national-security-council-nsc-official-briefing-the-national-security-adviser-on-why-rebel-groups-may-take-control-of-parts-of-syria.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Situation in Syria Is Marked by Conflict

Did Lebanon Fall Apart In the 1970s and 1980s because of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

It is yet to be seen if the current conflict in syria will have any effect on the peace that has been regained in Lebanon.... The author states that the falling apart of Lebanon was caused, directly and indirectly by the Arab-Israeli conflict which was raging all around it.... Its strategic position along the Mediterranean coast, as well as its proximity to Israel, made it a natural target for both sides of the conflict.... Despite the continued conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, Lebanon has managed to recover from the wars it experienced in the 1970s and 1980s and has regained the peace, which it once had....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Political Science: Syrian Civil War

His family was responsible for holding the presidency since the year 1971 in syria.... The above section provided a brief snapshot of the conflict and also the instances for which it got originated.... Further evaluation of different studies will depict different instances of the conflict and the diverse twists and turns which the war took over the years.... A popular uprising against the military rule in the year 1954 marked the army's contribution to the transfer of power to the civilians during the period beginning from 1958 to 1961....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Strategic Policy Brief on Security Developments in Syria

This objective of this document is to analyze the current security situation in syria and come up with a policy that is suitable for solving the security situation in the country.... This paper ''Strategic Policy Brief on Security Developments in syria'' tells that the ongoing conflict between the Syrian government and the opposition forces is arguably the worst war in recent times.... The adoption of these policies would certainly help solve the impasse and restore democracy in syria....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Outcome of the Ongoing Syrian Conflict

This coursework "The Outcome of the Ongoing Syrian conflict" focuses on the Syrian conflict that is not one that is particularly easy to understand.... Instead, it is a conflict that involves a great many foreign powers and a desire to influence a specific region.... As a means of understanding these dynamics, the Syrian conflict is best understood as something of a type of proxy war between the following actors: the Assad regime, NATO, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the Russian Federation....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Syrian: Civil War

The paper "Syrian: Civil War" presents that syria is an Arab nation placed in Western Asia.... The interesting thing about syria is that it is a country that is indeed strategically placed in the Middle East.... On its western borders, syria is akin to Lebanon.... The topography of syria is richly endowed with fertile and green plains, expansive deserts, and mountains.... Though Sunni Arabs happen to be a religious and ethnic majority in Syria, still syria is also the home to various other religious and ethnic groups like Shia Muslims, Christians, Turks, Kurds, Armenians, and Yezidi....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

The US Homeland Security Perspective to Guide the US Policies toward the ISIS Conflict

ExplanationNoteworthy, the phenomenon in syria is not ripe for simple elucidations.... 'The US Homeland Security Perspective to Guide the US Policies toward the ISIS Conflict" paper focuses on the Syrian civil war that referred to as the Syrian Revolution has been a continued war in syria since 2011.... To address the morphing challenge in syria, the U.... The conflict gave rise to several opposition groups, the first being the Free Syrian Army in 2011, and in 2013, the Islamic Front was formed....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Syrian Crisis: A Challenge to Human Rights and Humanitarian Intervention

Further, it seeks to analyze the shortcomings of the regime in addressing the humanitarian crisis in syria and whether the international community can play a role in finding an end to the crisis.... Special emphasis is placed on the ongoing crisis in syria.... The religious difference that exists between the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood and the Alawite regime coupled with Assad's oppressive regime has led the opposition to result in activities that have led to the current crisis in syria....
24 Pages (6000 words) Research Proposal

Geopolitical Consequences of Collapse of Syria

in syria.... Additionally, having a non-sovereign government in syria may spread extremists, escalate Sunni-Shiite fighting in syria and Lebanon, and provide an opportunity for use of Assad's chemical weapons.... Such a scenario will worsen the crisis in syria.... Many political commentators have feared that installation of the opposition forces in syria through a bombing campaign, or by whatever means, is likely to lead to a non-sovereign Syria....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us