StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Boeing vs Airbus Subsidy Dispute - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Boeing vs Airbus Subsidy Dispute" highlights that generally, Boeing and Airbus are facing the challenge of being called valid by WTO which will increase their cost of production as the benefits that were given under the agreement will disappear…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Boeing vs Airbus Subsidy Dispute
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Boeing vs Airbus Subsidy Dispute"

?Boeing vs Airbus subsidy dispute: The American jetliner company Boeing started operating before the European jetliner Airbus. Boeing along with McDonnell Douglas and Lockheed dominated the jetliner industry globally which completely sidelined the European divided commercial aviation industry. As a result of this, the four European governments joined hands and added their resources in a pool which ultimately resulted in the launch of Airbus (Gunstone, 2010). Airbus initially had the daunting challenges to compete in a market which was being dominated entirely by America. The new competitors were not able to survive in a market which was virtually the sole provider of the jets. To help develop a strong competitive foundation, the European governments starting providing substantial subsidies to Airbus for the development cost. The subsidies played important role in forcing the Lockheed out of the jetliner industry whereas Douglas merged with Boeing (Pelletier, 2010). Airbus eventually took the major share of the market and is providing more jetliners as compared to Boeing which raised the concern among the US. This led them to form an agreement at the WTO to reduce the subsidies to provide healthy competitive economic environment. The agreement at WTO clearly stated that both Boeing and Airbus can enjoy the direct governmental subsidies at 33% of the jetliner’s developmental costs. It also included the limitation on the subsidies provided by indirect programs or civilian or military institutions as well. In addition to these, many other limitations were imposed on the subsidies. However the market share for Airbus kept on increasing at a steady rate which again raised the concern for Boeing (Gunstone, 2010). When the matter was taken to WTO, the legal challenges which were drafted and exposed are following: 1) US accused Europe for providing illegal subsidies to Airbus and on the counterclaim the EU accused USA for providing indirect and illegal subsidies through NADA, department of Defense and other illegal tax incentives. Both the companies were actually violating the WTO agreement in their capacities. Legally, both the jetliners exploited the WTO agreement by violating the subsidies limitation clause. As of Boeing, it has been taking help from the Japanese government as well in the making of wings along with Italian government providing the similar support. The EU threatened to sue Japan for providing this help because without this help, the Boeing aircraft will be more expensive and less competitive. Both these companies in order to have the greater market share used the subsidies but didn’t really share the actual figure which leaves the global competitors and market very dubious over the certainty of their accusations. This case leaves the global market very vulnerable to violation of agreements and can create the dissatisfaction among the other jetliners in the competence and central position of WTA as well (Pelletier, 2010). Ethically, Boeing engaged in the aggressive pricing strategy with the help of unlimited subsidies affected the European jetliner Airbus by cutting their sales short, price and market suppression of Airbus in various markets of its hold. Secondly, Boeing terminated the WTO agreement on its own and filed the case against Airbus which was pretty much against the essence of the business. The agreement comes to an end by the mutual consent of both parties. In addition to this, both the companies have created duopoly which has left the market pervasive to other competitors which is strictly against the global business’s essence and practices. In addition to this, at this time when the successful industrialized countries should work towards trade liberalization, their subsidies wrangling will have the trickledown effect on the suppliers. The emerging economies look towards the industrialized economies for markets access (Newhouse, 2008). Culturally, the general inclination of US towards Japan in the greatest interest of their economies has created the clear biasness towards the Europeans. The Europeans on the other hand have cultural rigidness against the Americans which has led the formation of a bond between different European states to support their jetliner company. Instead of joining hands and working in line to provide the best quality to their customers, both the companies prefer the market share race (Newhouse, 2008). Role of host governments: Airbus-EU government The European government prior to WTO agreement was providing the launch-aid subsidies which after the agreement were limited. However the government was accused of providing larger subsidies than decided. The conditions on which this subsidy was provided were very generous. On the other hand, Boeing is not receiving any such launch aid from its government which makes the EU government role very dubious. The European governments joined hands including Spain, Germany, UK and Hamburg who provided the maximum facilities to increase the market share of the Airbus. The EU government might have decreased the launch aid but included the indirect aid from different EU states which goes against the agreement (Pandey, 2010). Boeing: American government The US government has involved a civil institution and military institution as well for the subsidiary and support for the manufacturing of Boeing. Boeing had a support of R&D from Department of Defense and NASA. The R&D contract includes the benefits for LCA division along with aircraft models of Boeing. In addition to this, it includes the reimbursement of R&D expenses of Boeing, no-cost cooperation with DOD engineers and NADA along with zero-cost testing equipments and facilities. The government of USA also arranged the facilities for Boeing that includes the transfer of vital knowledge and patents to Boeing with strict restriction on this knowledge usability by the competitors. The government has arranged the tax breaks for Boeing at the federal level which was illegal. In addition to this, the US government got in contract with Italy and Japan as well for the subsidies and other assemblies. All these subsidies helped the Boeing to practice aggressive pricing (Pandey, 2010). The violation of WTO agreement has been immense on both sides. The governments have acted in the greatest interest of their personal share market magnanimity without considering the ethics and legalities of the business world. Challenges for Boeing and Airbus In case of failed negotiations between the two giants, the WTO will obviously decide in favor of one complaint which will leave the opponent losing the subsidies and penalties. Boeing and Airbus are facing the challenge of being called valid by WTO which will increase their cost of production as the benefits that were given under the agreement will disappear. As both the companies are working in the duopoly which makes the market success highly dependent on the competitor’s decisions. Boeing has been trying to not push the issue too far so that it would lose its European customers. Both Airbus and Boeing are the significant contributors in the economic progress of US and EU. The economies of both the countries reap substantial advantages from these two jetliners. Each of these producers is also responsible for the world economy as both tend to outsource their operations globally. in case of failed negotiation, not only the host countries but the global business will suffer the severe setback in terms of technology, outsourcing, employment and profits (Pandey, 2010). References: Gunstone, B. (2010) Airbus: The complete story. Haynes Publishing. Newhouse, J. (2008) Boeing versus airbus: The inside story of the greatest international competition in business. Vintage. Pandey, M. (2010) How Boeing defied the airbus challenge: An insider’s account. CreateSpace. Pelletier, A. (2010) Boeing: The complete story. Haynes Publishing. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Boeing versus Airbus Subsidy Dispute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1430491-the-sweatshop-debate-nike
(Boeing Versus Airbus Subsidy Dispute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/management/1430491-the-sweatshop-debate-nike.
“Boeing Versus Airbus Subsidy Dispute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1430491-the-sweatshop-debate-nike.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Boeing vs Airbus Subsidy Dispute

Analysis of the Airbus-Boeing Dispute Presented to the World Trade Organization

Analysis of the Airbus-Boeing dispute Presented to the World Trade Organization Your Name Your Code Your University Date Introduction “The Geneva-based World Trade Organization helps establish trade rules in the global environment” (Ireland et al, 2008).... One of the areas that the World Trade Organization controls the affairs of large international firms is in the area of subsidy and countervailing.... Two major airline manufacturers, airbus and Boeing together produce almost all the airlines that are used throughout the world....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Sustainable Management Futures

This assignment "Sustainable Management Futures" shows that airbus is one of the leading market players in the global aircraft industry.... airbus is based in Toulouse, France.... airbus is actually a subsidiary of the European Aeronautic Defense and Apace Company that is commonly known as EADS.... In 2001, EADS took a huge step towards strengthening the individuality of airbus.... In 2001, efforts have been made by EADS and BAE to formally make airbus a single integrated firm....
16 Pages (4000 words) Assignment

Mandate of the Commission on State Aid

State Aid Cases Name Tutor Course Date Introduction Due to the current economic and financial crisis, state owned enterprises are finding it difficult to operate thus accumulating a lot of debt and sometimes making losses.... Due to this uncertain economic viability, some member states are taking measures to finance and even write off the debts, restructure, privatize these state owned enterprises....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Application of the Protectionist Movement

The issues that are raised in the case study have much to do with the intervention of governments in the market mechanism, specifically the distortion of the ability of the same to allocate the highest return to that producer that most effectively captures customer's demand, gathers resources primarily on their own and produces products to meet this demand....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

What Impact Did The Boeing - Airbus Dispute Have On The European Union

hellip; What Impact Did The Boeing - Airbus dispute Have On The European Union?... also the second-chief defense supplier in the world, and the main civil aircraft producer in the world in terms of aircraft orders after long straggling airbus for the past five years, and the main exporter in the United States.... airbus, which first transported additional planes than Boeing in 2003, will preserve that escort for 2005 as it anticipate to sell 370 planes in contrast with 290 (Fisher, 2002, P 1)....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Key Competitive Strategies on the Airbus Industrie

airbus mainly operates in four European countries, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Spain.... In past airbus suffered from a fragmented travel organization.... hellip; One goal of the travel management project was to create one central travel management organization and define a single airbus travel policy for all employees in all countries. ... ith growing business need including the decision to build the world's largest commercial aircraft, the A380 airbus's travel costs began to grow exponentially at the start of 21st century....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Subsidies in the EU and the WTO. An assessment of evolution and impact

Going back to history, the term subsidy was invented by Thomas Wolsey in 1513 which is defined as a tax imposed on people according to their ability to pay.... subsidy can also be seen as non collection of revenue or tariffs, helping via providing investment capital when the decision regarding investment subsidy includes furnishing goods and services but without including the general infrastructure.... Again acquiring products from a variety of firms at an advanced price than what would be paid in the market is also a significant part of subsidy....
22 Pages (5500 words) Essay

The Application of the European Community State Aid Rules

The main dispute originates from the fact that in the year 2003, Airbus (jointly owned by BAE Systems of UK and by EADS of Germany, France and Spain) which excelled the Boeing as the globe's largest manufacturer of commercial aircrafts with Boeing of U.... Further, the subsidy to the Airbus has caused adverse impacts to U.... oth Boeing and airbus are occupying more than fifty percent of the giant civil aircraft market globally.... that each time when airbus introduces a new aircraft, a number of European nations are extending financial aid as much as thirty-three percent of its developmental costs....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us